Literature DB >> 16262475

Why most people disapprove of me: experience sampling in impression formation.

Jerker Denrell1.   

Abstract

Individuals are typically more likely to continue to interact with people if they have a positive impression of them. This article shows how this sequential sampling feature of impression formation can explain several biases in impression formation. The underlying mechanism is the sample bias generated when the probability of interaction depends on current impressions. Because negative experiences decrease the probability of interaction, negative initial impressions are more stable than positive impressions. Negative initial impressions, however, are more likely to change for individuals who are frequently exposed to others. As a result, systematic differences in interaction patterns, due to social similarity or proximity, will produce systematic differences in impressions. This mechanism suggests an alternative explanation of several regularities in impression formation, including a negativity bias in impressions of outgroup members, systematic differences in performance evaluations, and more positive evaluations of proximate others. Copyright (c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16262475     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  9 in total

1.  Social sampling and expressed attitudes: Authenticity preference and social extremeness aversion lead to social norm effects and polarization.

Authors:  Gordon D A Brown; Stephan Lewandowsky; Zhihong Huang
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 2.  Human social sensing is an untapped resource for computational social science.

Authors:  Mirta Galesic; Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Jonas Dalege; Scott L Feld; Frauke Kreuter; Henrik Olsson; Drazen Prelec; Daniel L Stein; Tamara van der Does
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Learning in Noise: Dynamic Decision-Making in a Variable Environment.

Authors:  Todd M Gureckis; Bradley C Love
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.223

4.  Persistence of the uncanny valley: the influence of repeated interactions and a robot's attitude on its perception.

Authors:  Jakub A Złotowski; Hidenobu Sumioka; Shuichi Nishio; Dylan F Glas; Christoph Bartneck; Hiroshi Ishiguro
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-30

5.  Co-Evolution of Social Learning and Evolutionary Preparedness in Dangerous Environments.

Authors:  Björn Lindström; Ida Selbing; Andreas Olsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Beliefs about Others' Abilities Alter Learning from Observation.

Authors:  Ida Selbing; Andreas Olsson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Mouse-tracking reveals cognitive conflict during negative impression formation in women with Borderline Personality Disorder or Social Anxiety Disorder.

Authors:  Johanna Hepp; Pascal J Kieslich; Andrea M Wycoff; Katja Bertsch; Christian Schmahl; Inga Niedtfeld
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A Description-Experience Framework of the Psychology of Risk.

Authors:  Ralph Hertwig; Dirk U Wulff
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-12-07

9.  Is good more alike than bad? Positive-negative asymmetry in the differentiation between options. A study on the evaluation of fictitious political profiles.

Authors:  Magdalena Jablonska; Andrzej Falkowski; Robert Mackiewicz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.