Literature DB >> 16261829

Assessment of the qualitative variation in bacterial microflora among compartments of the intestinal tract of dogs by use of a molecular fingerprinting technique.

Jan S Suchodolski1, Craig G Ruaux, Jörg M Steiner, Kathrin Fetz, David A Williams.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the qualitative variation in bacterial microflora among compartments of the intestinal tract of dogs by use of a molecular fingerprinting technique. ANIMALS: 14 dogs (similarly housed and fed identical diets). PROCEDURE: Samples of intestinal contents were collected from the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, colon, and rectum of each dog. Bacterial DNA was extracted from the samples, and the variable V6 to V8 region of 16S ribosomal DNA (gene coding for 16S ribosomal RNA) was amplified by use of universal bacterial primers; polymerase chain reaction amplicons were separated via denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Similarity indices of DGGE banding patterns were used to assess variation in the bacterial microflora among different compartments of the intestine within and among dogs. Bacterial diversity was assessed by calculating the Simpson diversity index, the Shannon-Weaver diversity index, and evenness.
RESULTS: DGGE profiles indicated marked differences in bacterial composition of intestinal compartments among dogs (range of similarity, 25.6% to 36.6%) and considerable variation among compartments within individual dogs (range of similarity, 36.7% to 579%). Similarities between neighboring intestinal compartments were significantly greater than those between non-neighboring compartments. Diversity indices for the colon and rectum were significantly higher than those of the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results indicated that the different intestinal compartments of individual dogs appear to host different bacterial populations, and these compartmental populations vary among dogs. In dogs, fecal sample analysis may not yield accurate information regarding the composition of bacterial populations in compartments of the gastrointestinal tract.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16261829     DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Vet Res        ISSN: 0002-9645            Impact factor:   1.156


  20 in total

1.  Phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences reveals distal gut bacterial diversity in wild wolves (Canis lupus).

Authors:  Honghai Zhang; Lei Chen
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Bacteria, phages and pigs: the effects of in-feed antibiotics on the microbiome at different gut locations.

Authors:  Torey Looft; Heather K Allen; Brandi L Cantarel; Uri Y Levine; Darrell O Bayles; David P Alt; Bernard Henrissat; Thaddeus B Stanton
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Analysis of the bacterial diversity in the fecal material of the endangered Yangtze finless porpoise, Neophocaena phocaenoides asiaeorientalis.

Authors:  Richard William McLaughlin; Minmin Chen; Jinsong Zheng; Qingzhong Zhao; Ding Wang
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  Fecal Bacterial Composition of the Endangered Yangtze Finless Porpoises Living Under Captive and Semi-natural Conditions.

Authors:  Xiaoling Wan; Rui Ruan; Richard William McLaughlin; Yujiang Hao; Jinsong Zheng; Ding Wang
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  The canine gastrointestinal microbiota: early studies and research frontiers.

Authors:  Zongyu Huang; Zhiyuan Pan; Ruifu Yang; Yujing Bi; Xiaohui Xiong
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2020-01-28

6.  Effect of high contents of dietary animal-derived protein or carbohydrates on canine faecal microbiota.

Authors:  Ingrid Hang; Teemu Rinttila; Jürgen Zentek; Anu Kettunen; Susanna Alaja; Juha Apajalahti; Jaana Harmoinen; Willem M de Vos; Thomas Spillmann
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 7.  Understanding the canine intestinal microbiota and its modification by pro-, pre- and synbiotics - what is the evidence?

Authors:  Silke Schmitz; Jan Suchodolski
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2016-01-11

8.  Comparison of microbial populations in the small intestine, large intestine and feces of healthy horses using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism.

Authors:  Angelika Schoster; Luis Guillermo Arroyo; Henry Rolf Staempfli; Jeffrey Scott Weese
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-03-12

9.  Abundance and short-term temporal variability of fecal microbiota in healthy dogs.

Authors:  Jose F Garcia-Mazcorro; Scot E Dowd; Jeffrey Poulsen; Jörg M Steiner; Jan S Suchodolski
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Characterizing the bacterial microbiota in different gastrointestinal tract segments of the Bactrian camel.

Authors:  Jing He; Li Yi; Le Hai; Liang Ming; Wanting Gao; Rimutu Ji
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.