Literature DB >> 16261803

Axonal branching and recovery of coordinated muscle activity after transection of the facial nerve in adult rats.

D N Angelov1, O Guntinas-Lichius, K Wewetzer, W F Neiss, M Streppel.   

Abstract

Facial nerve surgery inevitablyleads to pareses, abnormally associated movements, and pathologically altered reflexes. The reason for this "post-paralytic syndrome" is the misdirected reinnervation of targets, which consists of two major components. First, due to malfunctioning axonal guidance, a muscle gets reinnervated by a "foreign" axon, that has been misrouted along a "wrong" fascicle. Second, the supernumerary collateral branches emerging from all transected axons simultaneously innervate antagonistic muscles and cause severe impairment of coordinated activity. Since it is hardly possible to influence the first major component and improve the guidance of several thousands of axons, we concentrated on the second major component and tried to reduce the collateral axonal branching. The efficiency of various treatments was evaluated in rats by determining: (1) the degree of post-operative axonal branching as estimated by the number of double-or triple-labeled perikarya after application of crystalline DiI, Fluoro-Gold (FG), and Fast Blue (FB) to the zygomatic, buccal, and marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve respectively; (2) the accuracy of reinnervation as estimated by the number of double-labeled perikarya innervating the whisker pad muscles before and after surgery as shown by intramuscular injections of FG and FB respectively; (3) the recovery of vibrissal motor performance, estimated by a video based motion analysis. So far, we have tried to reduce branching by alteration of the afferent trigeminal input to the axotomized facial motoneurons and by focal application of: (1) neurite outgrowth fostering ECM proteins; (2) neutralizing antibodies to NGF, BDNF, CNTF, GDNF, IGF-I, and FGF-II; (3) suspensions of olfactory ensheathing cells, Schwann cells, and bone marrow stroma cells; and (4) pieces of autologous olfactory mucosa to the transection site. Although most of these manipulations do influence peripheral nerve regeneration to some extent, only the application of autologous olfactory mucosa yielded a major improvement, i.e., better function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16261803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0301-5556            Impact factor:   1.231


  13 in total

1.  Manual stimulation of forearm muscles does not improve recovery of motor function after injury to a mixed peripheral nerve.

Authors:  N Sinis; O Guntinas-Lichius; A Irintchev; E Skouras; S Kuerten; S P Pavlov; H E Schaller; S A Dunlop; D N Angelov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Daily facial stimulation to improve recovery after facial nerve repair in rats.

Authors:  Robin W Lindsay; James T Heaton; Colin Edwards; Christopher Smitson; Kalpesh Vakharia; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2010 May-Jun

3.  A system for studying facial nerve function in rats through simultaneous bilateral monitoring of eyelid and whisker movements.

Authors:  James T Heaton; Jeffrey M Kowaleski; Roberto Bermejo; H Philip Zeigler; David J Ahlgren; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Modulating neuromuscular junction density changes in botulinum toxin-treated orbicularis oculi muscle.

Authors:  Andrew R Harrison; Zachary Berbos; Renzo A Zaldivar; Brian C Anderson; Mollie Semmer; Michael S Lee; Linda K McLoon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  The effects of venous ensheathment on facial nerve repair in the rat.

Authors:  Pei Chen; Christopher J Knox; Linli Yao; Chunli Li; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Ciliary neurotrophic factor promotes motor reinnervation of the musculocutaneous nerve in an experimental model of end-to-side neurorrhaphy.

Authors:  Petr Dubový; Otakar Raška; Ilona Klusáková; Lubomír Stejskal; Pavel Celakovský; Pavel Haninec
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 7.  Facial Nerve Repair: Bioengineering Approaches in Preclinical Models.

Authors:  Fuat Baris Bengur; Conrad Stoy; Mary A Binko; Wayne Vincent Nerone; Caroline Nadia Fedor; Mario G Solari; Kacey G Marra
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 7.376

8.  Schwann cells overexpressing FGF-2 alone or combined with manual stimulation do not promote functional recovery after facial nerve injury.

Authors:  Kirsten Haastert; Maria Grosheva; Srebrina K Angelova; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; Emmanouil Skouras; Joern Michael; Claudia Grothe; Sarah A Dunlop; Doychin N Angelov
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2009-10-08

9.  Impact of fetal brain tissue derived mesenchymal stem cell and fibrin glue on facial nerve crash injury

Authors:  Ömer Bayır; Tuğba Karagöz; Ferda Alpaslan Pınarlı; Gülistan Sanem Sarıbaş; Candan Özoğul; Kemal Keseroğlu; Güleser Saylam; Emel Çadallı Tatar; Sevilay Karahan; Bülent Öcal; Mehmet Hakan Korkmaz
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 0.973

Review 10.  Peripheral nerve injuries and transplantation of olfactory ensheathing cells for axonal regeneration and remyelination: fact or fiction?

Authors:  Christine Radtke; Jeffery D Kocsis
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.