Literature DB >> 16261714

[Participation in the Dutch national screening programme for uterine cervic cancer higher after invitation by a general practitioner, especially in groups with a traditional low level of attendance].

D P de Nooijer1, F G de Waart, A W F M van Leeuwen, W W J Spijker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into the differences in participation in the screening programme for uterine cervix cancer between women invited by a general practitioner (GP) and women invited by the local health authority (GGD). Specific attention was given to those groups whose participation is generally below average.
DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiological study.
METHOD: In the period 2000-2003, 237,719 women (30-60 years of age) were invited to participate in the national uterine cervix cancer screening programme in the Southwest of the Netherlands; 37.1% of the women were invited by the GP and 62.9% by the GGD. Data were obtained from the Cervix Information System of the GGDs. Differences in attendance between those invited by the GP and those invited by the GGD were tested by linear regression. Participation was defined as the number of women for whom the result of a cervical smear was known, divided by the number invited.
RESULTS: Invitation by a GP led to a 7.9% (95% CI: 7.5-8.3) higher attendance rate than invitation by a GGD. This difference in attendance was higher for women born in Morocco, Turkey, Surinam and the Netherlands Antilles/Aruba (17.2%; 95% CI: 15.2-I9.2), young women (11.9%; 95% CI: 10.8-13.0), women with a low socio-economic status (11.6%; 95% CI: 10.4-12.7), and women who lived in highly urban areas (13.0%; 95% CI: 12.3-13.6). The differences were the greatest among non-western women who were also part of another low-attendance group: 19.0% (95% CI: 16.7-21.2) for women who lived in highly urban areas and 20.8% (95% CI: 16.8-24.9) for those in the youngest age group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16261714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd        ISSN: 0028-2162


  8 in total

1.  Cultural tailoring for the promotion of hepatitis B screening in Turkish Dutch: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ytje J J van der Veen; Onno de Zwart; Johan Mackenbach; Jan Hendrik Richardus
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Text Messaging and Opt-out Mailed Outreach in Colorectal Cancer Screening: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sarah W Huf; David A Asch; Kevin G Volpp; Catherine Reitz; Shivan J Mehta
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 6.473

3.  Hepatitis B in Moroccan-Dutch: a quantitative study into determinants of screening participation.

Authors:  Nora Hamdiui; Mart L Stein; Aura Timen; Danielle Timmermans; Albert Wong; Maria E T C van den Muijsenbergh; Jim E van Steenbergen
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  Determinants of (non-)attendance at the Dutch cancer screening programmes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas Hg Bongaerts; Frederike L Büchner; Barend Jc Middelkoop; Onno R Guicherit; Mattijs E Numans
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.136

5.  Investigating the decrease in participation in the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme: The role of personal and organisational characteristics.

Authors:  Clare A Aitken; Sylvia Kaljouw; Albert G Siebers; Matilde Bron; Anne Morssink; Folkert J van Kemenade; Inge M C M de Kok
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-02-20

6.  Perspectives on cancer screening participation in a highly urbanized region: a Q-methodology study in The Hague, the Netherlands.

Authors:  Thomas H G Bongaerts; Frederike L Büchner; Matty R Crone; Job van Exel; Onno R Guicherit; Mattijs E Numans; Vera Nierkens
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 4.135

7.  Hepatitis B screening in the Turkish-Dutch population in Rotterdam, the Netherlands; qualitative assessment of socio-cultural determinants.

Authors:  Ytje Jj van der Veen; Onno de Zwart; Hélène Acm Voeten; Johan P Mackenbach; Jan Hendrik Richardus
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Rapid review of evaluation of interventions to improve participation in cancer screening services.

Authors:  Stephen W Duffy; Jonathan P Myles; Roberta Maroni; Abeera Mohammad
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.136

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.