Literature DB >> 16261646

Confidence interval construction for proportion difference in small-sample paired studies.

Man-Lai Tang1, Nian-Sheng Tang, Ivan S F Chan.   

Abstract

Paired dichotomous data may arise in clinical trials such as pre-/post-test comparison studies and equivalence trials. Reporting parameter estimates (e.g. odds ratio, rate difference and rate ratio) along with their associated confidence interval estimates becomes a necessity in many medical journals. Various asymptotic confidence interval estimators have long been developed for differences in correlated binary proportions. Nevertheless, the performance of these asymptotic methods may have poor coverage properties in small samples. In this article, we investigate several alternative confidence interval estimators for the difference between binomial proportions based on small-sample paired data. Specifically, we consider exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for rate difference via inverting a score test. The exact unconditional confidence interval guarantees the coverage probability, and it is recommended if strict control of coverage probability is required. However, the exact method tends to be overly conservative and computationally demanding. Our empirical results show that the approximate unconditional score confidence interval estimators based on inverting the score test demonstrate reasonably good coverage properties even in small-sample designs, and yet they are relatively easy to implement computationally. We illustrate the methods using real examples from a pain management study and a cancer study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16261646     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of vaccine seroresponse rates and adverse event rates through Bayesian and frequentist methods.

Authors:  Jin Liu; Feng Chen; Feng-Cai Zhu; Jian-Ling Bai; Jing-Xin Li; Hao Yu; Pei Liu; Ping Zeng
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Confidence intervals for assessing equivalence of two treatments with combined unilateral and bilateral data.

Authors:  Shi-Fang Qiu; Ji-Ran Tao
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 1.416

3.  Alternative Confidence Interval Methods Used in the Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.

Authors:  Semra Erdoğan; Orekıcı Temel Gülhan
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 2.238

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.