PURPOSE:Temozolomide (TMZ) has shown efficacy in metastatic melanoma equal to that of dacarbazine (DTIC), the standard chemotherapeutic agent for melanoma. As the combination with interferon-alfa (IFN-alpha) appears superior to single-agent DTIC regarding response rates, the purpose of this study was to compare TMZ alone and TMZ plus IFN-alpha in terms of objective response (OR), overall survival, and safety in a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred ninety-four patients with untreated stage IV metastatic melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system) were randomly assigned to receive either oral TMZ alone (200 mg/m2/day; days 1 through 5 every 28 days) or in combination with subcutaneous IFN-alpha (5 MU/m2; days 1, 3, and 5 every week). RESULTS:Two hundred eighty-two patients were eligible for an intent-to-treat analysis, 271 patients were treated per protocol. In the TMZ + IFN-alpha arm, 33 (24.1%) of 137 patients responded to therapy (partial or complete remission) whereas in the monotherapy arm, in 18 (13.4%) of 134 patients, a response was evident. Thus, the response rate was significantly higher in the combination arm (P = .036). Median survival time was 8.4 months for patients treated with TMZ (95% CI, 7.07 to 9.27) and 9.7 months for those treated with the combination (95% CI, 8.26 to 11.18; P = .16). Dose modifications and interval prolongations due to hematologic toxicity were significantly more frequent in the TMZ + IFN-alpha arm (P < .001). CONCLUSION: In metastatic melanoma treatment with TMZ + IFN-alpha leads to a significantly superior OR rate compared to treatment with TMZ alone, which did not translate into prolonged survival in our study population.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Temozolomide (TMZ) has shown efficacy in metastatic melanoma equal to that of dacarbazine (DTIC), the standard chemotherapeutic agent for melanoma. As the combination with interferon-alfa (IFN-alpha) appears superior to single-agent DTIC regarding response rates, the purpose of this study was to compare TMZ alone and TMZ plus IFN-alpha in terms of objective response (OR), overall survival, and safety in a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred ninety-four patients with untreated stage IV metastatic melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system) were randomly assigned to receive either oral TMZ alone (200 mg/m2/day; days 1 through 5 every 28 days) or in combination with subcutaneous IFN-alpha (5 MU/m2; days 1, 3, and 5 every week). RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-two patients were eligible for an intent-to-treat analysis, 271 patients were treated per protocol. In the TMZ + IFN-alpha arm, 33 (24.1%) of 137 patients responded to therapy (partial or complete remission) whereas in the monotherapy arm, in 18 (13.4%) of 134 patients, a response was evident. Thus, the response rate was significantly higher in the combination arm (P = .036). Median survival time was 8.4 months for patients treated with TMZ (95% CI, 7.07 to 9.27) and 9.7 months for those treated with the combination (95% CI, 8.26 to 11.18; P = .16). Dose modifications and interval prolongations due to hematologic toxicity were significantly more frequent in the TMZ + IFN-alpha arm (P < .001). CONCLUSION: In metastatic melanoma treatment with TMZ + IFN-alpha leads to a significantly superior OR rate compared to treatment with TMZ alone, which did not translate into prolonged survival in our study population.
Authors: Harshita Mishra; Pawan K Mishra; Adam Ekielski; Manu Jaggi; Zeenat Iqbal; Sushama Talegaonkar Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Ravi K Amaravadi; Lynn M Schuchter; David F McDermott; Amy Kramer; Lydia Giles; Kristi Gramlich; Mary Carberry; Andrea B Troxel; Richard Letrero; Katherine L Nathanson; Michael B Atkins; Peter J O'Dwyer; Keith T Flaherty Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: M Staudt; K Lasithiotakis; U Leiter; F Meier; T Eigentler; M Bamberg; M Tatagiba; P Brossart; C Garbe Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-04-06 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: J C Hassel; A Sucker; L Edler; H Kurzen; I Moll; C Stresemann; K Spieth; C Mauch; K Rass; R Dummer; D Schadendorf Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-08-24 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: D Schadendorf; S M Algarra; L Bastholt; G Cinat; B Dreno; A M M Eggermont; E Espinosa; J Guo; A Hauschild; T Petrella; J Schachter; P Hersey Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 32.976