Literature DB >> 16260468

Patterns of vascular and anatomical response after rotator cuff repair.

Stephen Fealy1, Ronald S Adler, Mark C Drakos, Anne M Kelly, Answorth A Allen, Frank A Cordasco, Russell F Warren, Stephen J O'Brien.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been assumed that a robust vascular response at the tendon to bone interface during rotator cuff repairs is an integral part to the healing process. There are few studies that have explored this in an in-vivo prospective fashion.
PURPOSE: To prospectively characterize vascular and anatomical patterns in repaired rotator cuff tendons using Power Doppler sonography in a double-blinded fashion. STUDY
DESIGN: Case control study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: Fifty patients undergoing rotator cuff repair were enrolled: 28 mini-open, 14 open, and 8 arthroscopic repairs; 20 patients were controls. Patients underwent Power Doppler sonography at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Power Doppler sonography analysis examined 6 areas of the rotator cuff repair: discretely marginated intrasubstance, partial-thickness defects, full-thickness defects, focal thinning of repair, presence of bursal or joint fluid, and location of anchors. A subjective scoring system assessed blood flow in each region.
RESULTS: There was a predictable, significant decrease in vascular scores after rotator cuff repair over time. The mean vascular score was 11.6 at 6 weeks, 8.3 at 3 months, 7.0 at 6 months, and 2.4 for controls. There was a significant difference (P < .05) in vascular recruitment scores between each time period, with the most robust flow at the peritendinous region. The lowest vascular score was at the anchor site or cancellous trough. Forty-eight percent of the patients had a rotator cuff repair defect postoperatively. These findings did not correlate with functional assessment and outcome at 6 months. There was no significant difference in vascular scores between the defect and no-defect groups. Mean University of California, Los Angeles; L'Insalata; and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores at 6 months were 28.6, 86.3, and 81.5, respectively. Thirty-three percent of asymptomatic controls had a rotator cuff tear that averaged 7.6 x 7.1 mm.
CONCLUSION: The robust vascular response dropped with time, which is not seen in asymptomatic shoulders. Nearly half of the patients demonstrated persistent rotator cuff defects after rotator cuff repair that did not correlate with functional outcome and physical findings at 6 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16260468     DOI: 10.1177/0363546505280212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  26 in total

1.  The effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on tendon-bone healing in a transosseous-equivalent sheep rotator cuff model.

Authors:  Vedran Lovric; Michael Ledger; Jerome Goldberg; Wade Harper; Nicky Bertollo; Matthew H Pelletier; Rema A Oliver; Yan Yu; William R Walsh
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Biological augmentation of rotator cuff tendon repair.

Authors:  David Kovacevic; Scott A Rodeo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Rotator cuff tears: pathology and repair.

Authors:  Hemang Yadav; Shane Nho; Anthony Romeo; John D MacGillivray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  [Epidemiology and pathophysiology of rotator cuff tears].

Authors:  J F Löhr; H K Uhthoff
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Surgical Technique to Repair Musculotendinous Junction Tear of Supraspinatus Using Lateral-Row Anchors to Avoid Cut-Through.

Authors:  Bancha Chernchujit; Prashant H Parate
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-01-16

6.  The validity and reliability of ultrasound on identifying supraspinatus tears during passive external rotation from 0° to 30°: a pilot project.

Authors:  June S Kennedy; Heather S Myers; Scott D Gibson; Matthew G Kanaan; Robert J Butler
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-07-20

Review 7.  The science of rotator cuff tears: translating animal models to clinical recommendations using simulation analysis.

Authors:  Sandeep Mannava; Johannes F Plate; Christopher J Tuohy; Thorsten M Seyler; Patrick W Whitlock; Walton W Curl; Thomas L Smith; Katherine R Saul
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Effect of scaffold morphology and cell co-culture on tenogenic differentiation of HADMSC on centrifugal melt electrospun poly (L‑lactic acid) fibrous meshes.

Authors:  Shaohua Wu; Hao Peng; Xiuhong Li; Philipp N Streubel; Yong Liu; Bin Duan
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 9.  Long-term outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff treatment.

Authors:  Pietro Spennacchio; Giuseppe Banfi; Davide Cucchi; Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Paolo Cabitza; Pietro Randelli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Open versus two forms of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Neal L Millar; Xiao Wu; Robyn Tantau; Elizabeth Silverstone; George A C Murrell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.