Literature DB >> 16259833

A study to assess the prevalence of chronic testicular pain in post-vasectomy men compared to non-vasectomised men.

Caroline Morris1, K Mishra, R J E Kirkman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of chronic post-vasectomy testicular pain (CPTP) compared to the prevalence of chronic testicular pain in a control population of non-vasectomised men.
METHODS: A retrospective postal study of 198 men who had a vasectomy more than 3 years previously at the Palatine Centre to determine the incidence of CPTP, of whom 101 (51%) replied (mean age 40.4 years, range 29-54 years, mean time since vasectomy 46.5 months). A control group of 102 men (mean age 40.2 years, range 28-55 years) who had not had a vasectomy were obtained via patients attending the community family planning clinics or associated general practitioner (GP) services in the same geographical area.
RESULTS: Occasional non-troublesome discomfort was reported by 37/101 of the post-vasectomy men compared to 21/102 of the control group. Occasional discomfort which was a nuisance was felt by 10/101 of the post-vasectomy group compared with 3/102 of the control group, and 6/101 in the post-vasectomy group reported pain severe enough to seek medical advice compared to only 2/102 controls. None of the post-vasectomy men regretted having had the operation.
CONCLUSIONS: Only 6% of cases (compared to 2% of controls) experienced pain severe enough to seek medical advice in the 3-4-year post-operative period. However, there was a significant difference in the prevalence of occasional testicular discomfort between post-vasectomy men and controls. Mostly these pains were not regarded as troublesome, however men attending for vasectomy counselling should be informed of the possibility of this morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 16259833     DOI: 10.1783/147118902101196298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care        ISSN: 1471-1893


  9 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation and management of chronic scrotal content pain.

Authors:  Laurence A Levine; Michael P Hoeh
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Update on vasectomy protocol.

Authors:  Doron S Stember; Harris M Nagler
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Methodical endoscopic repair of congenital indirect inguinoscrotal hernia in adult male patients with completely patent processus vaginalis.

Authors:  C R Berney
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 4.  Advances in male contraception.

Authors:  Stephanie T Page; John K Amory; William J Bremner
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 19.871

5.  Chronic scrotal pain caused by Mild Epididymitis:Report of a series of 44 cases.

Authors:  Yongqing Lai; Zuhu Yu; Bentao Shi; Liangchao Ni; Yunchu Liu; Shangqi Yang
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.088

Review 6.  Chronic orchialgia: Review of treatments old and new.

Authors:  Bayo Tojuola; Jeffrey Layman; Ibrahim Kartal; Ahmet Gudelogul; Jamin Brahmbhatt; Sijo Parekattil
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

Review 7.  Vasectomy reversal for post-vasectomy pain syndrome.

Authors:  L I Smith-Harrison; Ryan P Smith
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-05

Review 8.  Chronic orchialgia: epidemiology, diagnosis and evaluation.

Authors:  John T Sigalos; Alexander W Pastuszak
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-05

9.  Long-term safety, health and mental status in men with vasectomy.

Authors:  Kai Zhao; Li Wu; Xiangbin Kong; Yaoping Chen; Honggang Li; Yiqun Gu; Xuejun Shang; Chengliang Xiong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.