OBJECTIVE: To apply the Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations to the examination of the correlates of alternative healthcare utilization among Hispanic and African-American adults residing in public housing. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of a community-based sample. SETTING: Urban public housing communities in the county of Los Angeles. PARTICIPANTS: A geographically defined random sample of 287 African-American and Latino heads of households from three urban public housing communities. RESULTS: The use of alternative health care was assessed with three indices reflecting how frequently respondents used alternative sources of health care: 1) to prevent sickness; 2) to treat sickness; and 3) to substitute for conventional health care. Multivariate analysis of data indicates that lower education, greater perceived racial discrimination, and poorer health status were associated with the use of alternative health care to prevent sickness. Furthermore, greater perceived racial discrimination, greater financial strain, and poorer health status were associated with the use of alternative health care to treat sickness. In addition, four variables were associated with increased frequency of alternative healthcare utilization as a substitute for conventional care, namely: 1) diminished belief that powerful individuals (such as healthcare professionals) control one's health; 2) greater perception of racial discrimination; 3) greater financial strain; and 4) reduced access to health care. CONCLUSION: Enabling characteristics helped explain the use of alternative health care to treat sickness as a substitute for conventional health care, but not to prevent sickness, in this population. Perceived racial discrimination was the strongest correlate for each type of alternative healthcare use, while health status was also a strong predictor. The use of alternative health care for prevention and for substitution should be examined separately in disadvantaged minority populations.
OBJECTIVE: To apply the Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations to the examination of the correlates of alternative healthcare utilization among Hispanic and African-American adults residing in public housing. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of a community-based sample. SETTING: Urban public housing communities in the county of Los Angeles. PARTICIPANTS: A geographically defined random sample of 287 African-American and Latino heads of households from three urban public housing communities. RESULTS: The use of alternative health care was assessed with three indices reflecting how frequently respondents used alternative sources of health care: 1) to prevent sickness; 2) to treat sickness; and 3) to substitute for conventional health care. Multivariate analysis of data indicates that lower education, greater perceived racial discrimination, and poorer health status were associated with the use of alternative health care to prevent sickness. Furthermore, greater perceived racial discrimination, greater financial strain, and poorer health status were associated with the use of alternative health care to treat sickness. In addition, four variables were associated with increased frequency of alternative healthcare utilization as a substitute for conventional care, namely: 1) diminished belief that powerful individuals (such as healthcare professionals) control one's health; 2) greater perception of racial discrimination; 3) greater financial strain; and 4) reduced access to health care. CONCLUSION: Enabling characteristics helped explain the use of alternative health care to treat sickness as a substitute for conventional health care, but not to prevent sickness, in this population. Perceived racial discrimination was the strongest correlate for each type of alternative healthcare use, while health status was also a strong predictor. The use of alternative health care for prevention and for substitution should be examined separately in disadvantaged minority populations.
Authors: Mohsen Bazargan; Chizobam O Ani; David W Hindman; Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi; Richard S Baker; Douglas Bell; Michael Rodriquez Journal: J Altern Complement Med Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 2.579