Literature DB >> 16258573

Healthline: do primary care doctors agree with the advice?

Ian St George1, Matthew Cullen, Michelle Branney.   

Abstract

AIMS: To assess agreement between the advice to symptomatic callers to Healthline, and that advised by primary care doctors given the same clinical information, and thus to assess the safety of Healthline advice.
METHODS: Ninety records of symptomatic calls to Healthline were examined by three primary care specialists, blinded to the actual advice given. They independently recorded what they would have advised, and their advice was compared with that actually given by the Healthline nurse guided by Care Enhance Call Centre software.
RESULTS: Variation among the three doctors was greater than that between the median doctor and Healthline. In 82% of cases, the median doctor triaged to an endpoint close to (or lower than) Healthline. In all but one of the remainder, at least one doctor thought there was no risk to the patient (i.e. in 99% of cases). Review of that case indicated nurse error and the guideline itself was judged to be safe.
CONCLUSION: New Zealand primary care specialists regarded the Care Enhance Call Centre decision support software used by Healthline as clinically safe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16258573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Med J        ISSN: 0028-8446


  2 in total

Review 1.  Safety of telephone triage in out-of-hours care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Linda Huibers; Marleen Smits; Vera Renaud; Paul Giesen; Michel Wensing
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.581

2.  Development and testing of the KERNset: an instrument to assess the quality of telephone triage in out-of-hours primary care services.

Authors:  Marleen Smits; Ellen Keizer; Paul Ram; Paul Giesen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 2.655

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.