BACKGROUND: Recent data have changed our views of prognostic factors in cutaneous melanoma. While some newer methods have yielded better prognostic information, some insights have evolved as a result of large-scale population-based analyses. METHODS: We review current data on several different prognostic factors and divide these factors according to their application in localized primary melanoma or metastatic melanoma. For each prognostic factor, the level of evidence supporting its use and its applicability to clinical practice are considered. RESULTS: For localized primary melanoma, the dominant predictors of survival include lesion thickness, ulceration, and lymph node involvement. Factors such as age, sex, anatomic location, and satellite/in-transit lesions are important in localized melanoma. Factors currently being investigated are tumor vascularity, vascular invasion, mitotic rate, tumor regression, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. For metastatic melanoma, the most important prognostic factors are site of metastases and the presence of elevated serum lactic dehydrogenase. The value of these prognostic factors to clinicians caring for melanoma patients is discussed. CONCLUSIONS: A better understanding of prognostic factors in cutaneous melanoma has evolved over the last decade, allowing oncologists to provide appropriate treatment for their patients. Many of the prognostic factors are interrelated. In the near future, it is expected that several molecular genetic factors will provide more insight into the prognosis of patients with melanoma.
BACKGROUND: Recent data have changed our views of prognostic factors in cutaneous melanoma. While some newer methods have yielded better prognostic information, some insights have evolved as a result of large-scale population-based analyses. METHODS: We review current data on several different prognostic factors and divide these factors according to their application in localized primary melanoma or metastatic melanoma. For each prognostic factor, the level of evidence supporting its use and its applicability to clinical practice are considered. RESULTS: For localized primary melanoma, the dominant predictors of survival include lesion thickness, ulceration, and lymph node involvement. Factors such as age, sex, anatomic location, and satellite/in-transit lesions are important in localized melanoma. Factors currently being investigated are tumor vascularity, vascular invasion, mitotic rate, tumor regression, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. For metastatic melanoma, the most important prognostic factors are site of metastases and the presence of elevated serum lactic dehydrogenase. The value of these prognostic factors to clinicians caring for melanomapatients is discussed. CONCLUSIONS: A better understanding of prognostic factors in cutaneous melanoma has evolved over the last decade, allowing oncologists to provide appropriate treatment for their patients. Many of the prognostic factors are interrelated. In the near future, it is expected that several molecular genetic factors will provide more insight into the prognosis of patients with melanoma.
Authors: Zev Williams; Iddo Z Ben-Dov; Rony Elias; Aleksandra Mihailovic; Miguel Brown; Zev Rosenwaks; Thomas Tuschl Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-02-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Richard L White; Gregory D Ayers; Virginia H Stell; Shouluan Ding; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Jonathan C Salo; Barbara A Pockaj; Richard Essner; Mark Faries; Kim James Charney; Eli Avisar; Axel Hauschild; Friederike Egberts; Bruce J Averbook; Carlos A Garberoglio; John T Vetto; Merrick I Ross; David Chu; Vijay Trisal; Harald Hoekstra; Eric Whitman; Harold J Wanebo; Daniel Debonis; Michael Vezeridis; Aaron Chevinsky; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet; Yu Shyr; Lynne Berry; Zhiguo Zhao; Seng-Jaw Soong; Stanley P L Leong Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2011-06-07 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Paula J Foster; Elizabeth A Dunn; Kristina E Karl; Jonatan A Snir; Colleen M Nycz; Alfred J Harvey; Ron J Pettis Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Parvin Rajabi; Ali Neshat; Mozhgan Mokhtari; Mohammad A Rajabi; Mehdi Eftekhari; Payam Tavakoli Journal: J Res Med Sci Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 1.852