| Literature DB >> 16258198 |
Yusuf Kenan Coban1, Ergul Belge Kurutas, Harun Ciralik.
Abstract
Fat necrosis remains a serious complication in reconstructive flaps. In clinical setting, it is well known that fat tissue is more susceptible to ischemic events. We aimed to evaluate early histological and biochemical changes of adipofascial tissue in an experimental model. An epigastric flap model in rats was used to evaluate the effect of ischemia-reperfusion (I-R) injury on adipofascial tissue. Two groups of animals (one with ischemia alone and other ischemia-reperfusion group) were used to evaluate the degree of histological edema, congestion and extravascular bleeding, and early biochemical alterations within the adipofascial flaps. The biochemical parameters included glutathione (GSH) and malondialdehyde (MDA). In each group, contralateral groin subcutaneous adipose tissue served as control. These evaluations were compared to normal unmanipulated, contralateral abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue. The ischemia-reperfused flap group showed histologically significantly much edema congestion and bleeding than the control groups (P<.0001). The control group showed less edema in fat tissue than the ischemia-alone group (P<.05). All of the flaps in the ischemia-only group showed significantly less bleeding and edema than I-R group (P<.001). The ratio of MDA/GSH was 33 in control, 37 in ischemia alone, and 82 in ischemia-reperfusion groups, respectively. This study confirms that significant histologic and biochemical alteration occurs after ischemia and ischemia-reperfusion events in adipose tissue. Marked drop in adipose tissue antioxidant levels after I-R suggested that preemptive measures to this decrease should be undertaken in clinical settings.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16258198 PMCID: PMC1533892 DOI: 10.1155/MI.2005.304
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mediators Inflamm ISSN: 0962-9351 Impact factor: 4.711
Scales for edema and congestion in flap adipose tissue.
| Grade | Edema | Congestion | Bleeding |
| 0 | No edema | Normal adipose tissue | No bleeding |
| 1 | Minimal edema | Minimal congestion | Minimal |
| 2 | Edema < 25% of section | Fat congestion < 25% of section | Moderate |
| 3 | Edema > 25% to < 50% of section | Fat congestion > 25% to < 50% of section | Excessive |
| 4 | Edema > 50% to < 75% of section | Fat congestion > 50% to < 75% of section | — |
| 5 | Edema > 75% of section | Fat congestion > 75% of section | — |
Adipose tissue MDA/GSH ratios in groups are shown as mean ± standard deviation.
| Groups | MDA (nmol/mg protein)/GSH |
| (micromol/mg protein) Ratio | |
| Ischemia only | 36.9 ± 2.1 |
| Control of ischemia | 32.65 ± 2 |
| Ischemia-reperfusion | 73.5 ± 5.8 |
| Control of I-R | 33.1 ± 1.8 |
Figure 1Marked edema in the adipose tissue after ischemia is seen (H&E, ×50).
Figure 2Congestion in the vessels with marked edema and hemorrhage in the adipose tissue are seen after ischemia-reperfusion (H&E, ×50).
Figure 3Normal adipose tissue (H&E, ×50).
Histologic grading results are seen for each rat within groups; H = hemorrhagia, E = edema, C = congestion; Isc = ischemia-only group, I-R = ischemia-reperfusion.
| Histologic grading scores | |||||||||
| I-R | Ischemia alone | Control | |||||||
| Rat no. | H | E | C | H | E | C | H | E | C |
| 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |