Literature DB >> 16258182

Torso stabilization reduces the metabolic cost of producing cycling power.

John McDaniel1, Andrew Subudhi, James C Martin.   

Abstract

Many researchers have used cycling exercise to evaluate muscle metabolism. Inherent in such studies is an assumption that changes in whole-body respiration are due solely to respiration at the working muscle. Some researchers, however, have speculated that the metabolic cost of torso stabilization may contribute to the metabolic cost of cycling. Therefore, our primary purpose was to determine whether a torso stabilization device would reduce the metabolic cost of producing cycling power. Our secondary purpose was to determine the validity of the ergometer used in this study. Nine male cyclists cycled on a Velotron cycle ergometer at mechanical power outputs intended to elicit 50, 75, and 100% of their ventilatory threshold at 40, 60, and 80 rpm, with and without torso stabilization. Power was controlled by the Velotron in iso-power mode and measured with an SRM powermeter. We determined metabolic cost by indirect calorimetery and recorded power output. Torso stabilization significantly reduced metabolic cost of producing submaximal power (1%), and reduction tended to be greatest at the lower pedaling rates where pedaling force was greatest (1.6% at 40 rpm, 1.2% at 60 rpm, 0.2% at 80 rpm). Power, measured with the SRM powermeter, was strongly correlated with that specified to the Velotron ergometer control unit (R(2) > 0.99). We conclude that muscular contractions associated with torso stabilization elicit significant metabolic costs, which tend to be greatest at low pedaling rates. Researchers who intend to make precise inferences regarding metabolism in the working muscles of the legs may wish to provide torso stabilization as a means of reducing variability, particularly when comparing metabolic data across a wide range of pedaling rates.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16258182     DOI: 10.1139/h05-132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1066-7814


  6 in total

1.  Effect of "Pose" cycling on efficiency and pedaling mechanics.

Authors:  Thomas Korff; Graham Fletcher; David Brown; Lee M Romer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Effect of pedaling technique on muscle activity and cycling efficiency.

Authors:  Daniel T Cannon; Fred W Kolkhorst; Daniel J Cipriani
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Consistency of perceptual and metabolic responses to a laboratory-based simulated 4,000-m cycling time trial.

Authors:  Mark R Stone; Kevin Thomas; Michael Wilkinson; Alan St Clair Gibson; Kevin G Thompson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Evaluation of Accelerometer-Derived Data in the Context of Cycling Cadence and Saddle Height Changes in Triathlon.

Authors:  Stuart A Evans; Daniel A James; David Rowlands; James B Lee
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Impact of Centre-of-Mass Acceleration on Perceived Exertion, the Metabolic Equivalent and Heart Rate Reserve in Triathlete Spin Cycling: a Pilot Study.

Authors:  Stuart A Evans; Daniel A James; David Rowlands; James B Lee
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 2.193

6.  Single Leg Cycling Offsets Reduced Muscle Oxygenation in Hypoxic Environments.

Authors:  Shane Draper; Tyler Singer; Cody Dulaney; John McDaniel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.