PURPOSE: We previously evaluated fatigue, menopausal symptoms, and cognitive dysfunction in patients receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer and matched healthy women. Here we report assessment of these women 1 and 2 years later. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients without relapse and controls were evaluated by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-General Quality of Life questionnaire, with subscales for fatigue and endocrine symptoms, and by the High Sensitivity Cognitive Screen. RESULTS: There were 104, 91, and 83 patients and 102, 81, and 81 controls assessed at baseline and at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Median Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Fatigue scores (range, 0 to 52) for patients improved from 31 (on chemotherapy) to 43 and 45 at 1 and 2 years, respectively, but were stable in controls (46 to 48). Median Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Endocrine Symptoms scores (range, 0 to 72) for patients improved from 57 (on chemotherapy) to 59 and 61 at 1 and 2 years, respectively, and were stable in controls (64 to 65). Differences between patients and controls remained significant for these scales. The incidence of moderate-severe cognitive dysfunction by the High Sensitivity Cognitive Screen decreased in patients from 16% (on chemotherapy) to 4.4% and 3.8% and in controls from 5% to 3.6% and 0% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. There were minimal differences between estrogen receptor-positive patients who started hormonal therapy (mainly tamoxifen) after chemotherapy and estrogen receptor-negative patients who did not. Differences in quality of life between patients and controls were significant only at baseline. CONCLUSION: Fatigue, menopausal symptoms, and cognitive dysfunction are important adverse effects of chemotherapy that improve in most patients. Hormonal treatment has minimal impact on them.
PURPOSE: We previously evaluated fatigue, menopausal symptoms, and cognitive dysfunction in patients receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer and matched healthy women. Here we report assessment of these women 1 and 2 years later. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients without relapse and controls were evaluated by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-General Quality of Life questionnaire, with subscales for fatigue and endocrine symptoms, and by the High Sensitivity Cognitive Screen. RESULTS: There were 104, 91, and 83 patients and 102, 81, and 81 controls assessed at baseline and at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Median Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Fatigue scores (range, 0 to 52) for patients improved from 31 (on chemotherapy) to 43 and 45 at 1 and 2 years, respectively, but were stable in controls (46 to 48). Median Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Endocrine Symptoms scores (range, 0 to 72) for patients improved from 57 (on chemotherapy) to 59 and 61 at 1 and 2 years, respectively, and were stable in controls (64 to 65). Differences between patients and controls remained significant for these scales. The incidence of moderate-severe cognitive dysfunction by the High Sensitivity Cognitive Screen decreased in patients from 16% (on chemotherapy) to 4.4% and 3.8% and in controls from 5% to 3.6% and 0% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. There were minimal differences between estrogen receptor-positive patients who started hormonal therapy (mainly tamoxifen) after chemotherapy and estrogen receptor-negative patients who did not. Differences in quality of life between patients and controls were significant only at baseline. CONCLUSION:Fatigue, menopausal symptoms, and cognitive dysfunction are important adverse effects of chemotherapy that improve in most patients. Hormonal treatment has minimal impact on them.
Authors: Kristin M Phillips; Heather S Jim; Brent J Small; Christine Laronga; Michael A Andrykowski; Paul B Jacobsen Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-12-12 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Catherine M Bender; John D Merriman; Amanda L Gentry; Gretchen M Ahrendt; Sarah L Berga; Adam M Brufsky; Frances E Casillo; Meredith M Dailey; Kirk I Erickson; Frances M Kratofil; Priscilla F McAuliffe; Margaret Q Rosenzweig; Christopher M Ryan; Susan M Sereika Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Cristiane Decat Bergerot; Hannah-Rose Mitchell; Kimlin Tam Ashing; Youngmee Kim Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Claudine Legault; Pauline M Maki; Susan M Resnick; Laura Coker; Patricia Hogan; Therese B Bevers; Sally A Shumaker Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-09-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Melissa S Y Thong; Floortje Mols; Xin S Wang; Valery E P P Lemmens; Tineke J Smilde; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Julienne E Bower; Patricia A Ganz; Michael R Irwin; Steven Castellon; Jesusa Arevalo; Steven W Cole Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-03-25 Impact factor: 44.544