OBJECTIVE: In a previous study, we mapped the ploidy heterogeneity of prostate cancer using flow cytometry in 676 tumor samples from 50 radical prostatectomy specimens. Ploidy heterogeneity was common (42% of tumors) and was found in all non-diploid tumors. The volume of non-diploid tumor was estimated and found to predict extra-prostatic extension and seminal vesicle invasion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of tumor heterogeneity on preoperative ploidy assessment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 50 men at least six core biopsies were taken before prostatectomy. Sections from biopsies with cancer were Feulgen-stained for image cytometry. After exclusion of biopsies with insufficient material, 123 histograms from 48 men (mean 2.6; range 1-7) remained for analysis. RESULTS: In 32 men, biopsies were diploid. In 16 men, at least one biopsy was non-diploid (14 tetraploid, two aneuploid) and 10 of them also had diploid biopsies. In 34 men (71%), the prostatectomy specimens were correctly predicted as being either diploid (48%) or non-diploid (23%). The sensitivity and specificity of biopsies for predicting non-diploid cancer were 55% and 82%, respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values were 69% and 72%, respectively. The ploidy status of tumors with and without ploidy heterogeneity was correctly predicted in 55% and 82% of cases, respectively (p=0.04). Biopsies underestimated ploidy in 9/20 tumors (45%) with heterogeneous ploidy status. Underestimation mainly occurred when one or two cores were analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative prediction of the ploidy status of prostate cancer is hampered by tumor heterogeneity. Analysis of multiple biopsies is important for correct preoperative ploidy estimation.
OBJECTIVE: In a previous study, we mapped the ploidy heterogeneity of prostate cancer using flow cytometry in 676 tumor samples from 50 radical prostatectomy specimens. Ploidy heterogeneity was common (42% of tumors) and was found in all non-diploid tumors. The volume of non-diploid tumor was estimated and found to predict extra-prostatic extension and seminal vesicle invasion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of tumor heterogeneity on preoperative ploidy assessment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 50 men at least six core biopsies were taken before prostatectomy. Sections from biopsies with cancer were Feulgen-stained for image cytometry. After exclusion of biopsies with insufficient material, 123 histograms from 48 men (mean 2.6; range 1-7) remained for analysis. RESULTS: In 32 men, biopsies were diploid. In 16 men, at least one biopsy was non-diploid (14 tetraploid, two aneuploid) and 10 of them also had diploid biopsies. In 34 men (71%), the prostatectomy specimens were correctly predicted as being either diploid (48%) or non-diploid (23%). The sensitivity and specificity of biopsies for predicting non-diploid cancer were 55% and 82%, respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values were 69% and 72%, respectively. The ploidy status of tumors with and without ploidy heterogeneity was correctly predicted in 55% and 82% of cases, respectively (p=0.04). Biopsies underestimated ploidy in 9/20 tumors (45%) with heterogeneous ploidy status. Underestimation mainly occurred when one or two cores were analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative prediction of the ploidy status of prostate cancer is hampered by tumor heterogeneity. Analysis of multiple biopsies is important for correct preoperative ploidy estimation.