BACKGROUND: We have recently demonstrated that remote ischemic preconditioning reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury in animal models. The mechanisms by which the remote ischemic preconditioning stimulus exerts its effect remain to be fully defined, and its effect on myocardial gene expression is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that remote ischemic preconditioning modifies myocardial gene expression immediately after the remote ischemic preconditioning stimulus (early phase) and 24 hours later (late phase). METHODS: Twenty male (C57BL/6) 10- to 12-week-old mice were randomized into 4 groups: group 1 (control, early phase; n = 5), group 2 (remote ischemic preconditioning, early phase; n = 5), group 3 (control, late phase; n = 5), and group 4 (remote ischemic preconditioning, late phase; n = 5). Groups 2 and 4 underwent remote ischemic preconditioning induced by 6 cycles of 4 minutes of occlusion and 4 minutes of reperfusion of the femoral artery. Groups 1 and 2 were killed 15 minutes after completion of sham procedure or remote ischemic preconditioning, and the hearts were removed and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Groups 3 and 4 were killed 24 hours after remote ischemic preconditioning, and the hearts were harvested in the same fashion. Gene expression was assessed by using the Affymetrix MG-430A chip (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, Calif). RESULTS: Data filtering (P < .05, analysis of variance) and hierarchic 2-way clustering identified significant differences in gene expression among the 4 groups. Genes involved in protection against oxidative stress (eg, Hadhsc, Prdx4, and Fabp4) and cytoprotection (Hsp73) were upregulated, whereas many proinflammatory genes (eg, Egr-1 and Dusp 1 and 6) were suppressed. CONCLUSION: A simple remote ischemic preconditioning stimulus modifies myocardial gene expression by upregulating cardioprotective genes and suppressing genes potentially involved in the pathogenesis of ischemia-reperfusion injury.
BACKGROUND: We have recently demonstrated that remote ischemic preconditioning reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury in animal models. The mechanisms by which the remote ischemic preconditioning stimulus exerts its effect remain to be fully defined, and its effect on myocardial gene expression is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that remote ischemic preconditioning modifies myocardial gene expression immediately after the remote ischemic preconditioning stimulus (early phase) and 24 hours later (late phase). METHODS: Twenty male (C57BL/6) 10- to 12-week-old mice were randomized into 4 groups: group 1 (control, early phase; n = 5), group 2 (remote ischemic preconditioning, early phase; n = 5), group 3 (control, late phase; n = 5), and group 4 (remote ischemic preconditioning, late phase; n = 5). Groups 2 and 4 underwent remote ischemic preconditioning induced by 6 cycles of 4 minutes of occlusion and 4 minutes of reperfusion of the femoral artery. Groups 1 and 2 were killed 15 minutes after completion of sham procedure or remote ischemic preconditioning, and the hearts were removed and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Groups 3 and 4 were killed 24 hours after remote ischemic preconditioning, and the hearts were harvested in the same fashion. Gene expression was assessed by using the Affymetrix MG-430A chip (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, Calif). RESULTS: Data filtering (P < .05, analysis of variance) and hierarchic 2-way clustering identified significant differences in gene expression among the 4 groups. Genes involved in protection against oxidative stress (eg, Hadhsc, Prdx4, and Fabp4) and cytoprotection (Hsp73) were upregulated, whereas many proinflammatory genes (eg, Egr-1 and Dusp 1 and 6) were suppressed. CONCLUSION: A simple remote ischemic preconditioning stimulus modifies myocardial gene expression by upregulating cardioprotective genes and suppressing genes potentially involved in the pathogenesis of ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Authors: Ryan D Sheldon; Bruno T Roseguini; John P Thyfault; Brett D Crist; M H Laughlin; Sean C Newcomer Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2012-03-22
Authors: A Phillip Owens; Nathan Robbins; Keith Saum; Shannon M Jones; Akiva Kirschner; Jessica G Woo; Connie McCoy; Samuel Slone; Marc E Rothenberg; Elaine M Urbina; Michael Tranter; Jack Rubinstein Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2018-09-14 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Arzu Bilgin-Freiert; Joshua R Dusick; Nathan R Stein; Maria Etchepare; Paul Vespa; Nestor R Gonzalez Journal: Transl Stroke Res Date: 2012-04-10 Impact factor: 6.829