Literature DB >> 16256318

Paying attention to saccadic intrusions.

E Gowen1, R V Abadi, E Poliakoff.   

Abstract

Fixation to a target in primary gaze is invariably interrupted by physiological conjugate saccadic intrusions (SI). These small idiosyncratic eye movements (usually <1 degrees in amplitude) take the form of an initial horizontal fast eye movement away from the desired eye position, followed after a variable duration by a return saccade or drift. As the aetiology of SI is still unclear, it was the aim of this study to investigate whether SI are related to exogenous or endogenous attentional processes. This was achieved by varying (a) the "bottom-up" target viewing conditions (target presence, servo control of the target, target background, target size) and (b) the 'top-down' attentional state (instruction change--'look' or 'hold eyes steady' and passive fixation versus active--'respond to change' fixation) in 13 subjects (the number of participants in each task varied between 7 and 11). We also manipulated the orientation of pure exogenous attention through a cue-target task, during which subjects were required to respond to a target, preceded by a non-informative cue by either pressing a button or making a saccade towards the target. SI amplitude, duration, frequency and direction were measured. SI amplitude was found to be significantly higher when the target was absent and SI frequency significantly lower during open loop conditions. Target size and background influenced SI behaviour in an idiosyncratic manner, although there was a trend for subjects to exhibit lower SI frequencies and amplitudes when a patterned background was present and larger SI amplitudes with larger target sizes. SI frequency decreased during the "hold eyes steady" passive command as well as during active fixation but SI direction was not influenced by the exogenous cue-target task. These results suggest that SI are related to endogenous rather than exogenous attention mechanisms. Our experiments lead us to propose that SI represent shifts in endogenous attention that reflect a baseline attention state present during laboratory fixation tasks and may prove to be a useful tool to explore higher cortical control of fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16256318     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  7 in total

Review 1.  The impact of microsaccades on vision: towards a unified theory of saccadic function.

Authors:  Susana Martinez-Conde; Jorge Otero-Millan; Stephen L Macknik
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Distinctive features of saccadic intrusions and microsaccades in progressive supranuclear palsy.

Authors:  Jorge Otero-Millan; Alessandro Serra; R John Leigh; Xoana G Troncoso; Stephen L Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Modulation of saccadic intrusions by exogenous and endogenous attention.

Authors:  E Gowen; R V Abadi; E Poliakoff; P C Hansen; R C Miall
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Visual fixation development in children.

Authors:  Eva Aring; Marita Andersson Grönlund; Ann Hellström; Jan Ygge
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Ocular fixation instabilities in motor neurone disease. A marker of frontal lobe dysfunction?

Authors:  Colette Donaghy; Ralph Pinnock; Sharon Abrahams; Chris Cardwell; Orla Hardiman; Victor Patterson; R Canice McGivern; J Mark Gibson
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Saccadic intrusions in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

Authors:  Wolfgang Becker; Martin Gorges; Dorothée Lulé; Elmar Pinkhardt; Albert C Ludolph; Jan Kassubek
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 0.957

7.  Dissociating neuronal gamma-band activity from cranial and ocular muscle activity in EEG.

Authors:  Joerg F Hipp; Markus Siegel
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.