Literature DB >> 16256264

Integrated treatment and recycling of stormwater: a review of Australian practice.

Belinda E Hatt1, Ana Deletic, Tim D Fletcher.   

Abstract

With the use of water approaching, and in some cases exceeding, the limits of sustainability in many locations, there is an increasing recognition of the need to utilise stormwater for non-potable requirements, thus reducing the demand on potable sources. This paper presents a review of Australian stormwater treatment and recycling practices as well as a discussion of key lessons and identified knowledge gaps. Where possible, recommendations for overcoming these knowledge gaps are given. The review of existing stormwater recycling systems focussed primarily on the recycling of general urban runoff (runoff generated from all urban surfaces) for non-potable purposes. Regulations and guidelines specific to stormwater recycling need to be developed to facilitate effective design of such systems, and to minimise risks of failure. There is a clear need for the development of innovative techniques for the collection, treatment and storage of stormwater. Existing stormwater recycling practice is far ahead of research, in that there are no technologies designed specifically for stormwater recycling. Instead, technologies designed for general stormwater pollution control are frequently utilised, which do not guarantee the necessary reliability of treatment. Performance modelling for evaluation purposes also needs further research, so that industry can objectively assess alternative approaches. Just as many aspects of these issues may have impeded adoption of stormwater, another impediment to adoption has been the lack of a practical and widely accepted method for assessing the many financial, social and ecological costs and benefits of stormwater recycling projects against traditional alternatives. Such triple-bottom-line assessment methodologies need to be trialled on stormwater recycling projects. If the costs and benefits of recycling systems can be shown to compare favourably with the costs and benefits of conventional practices this will provide an incentive to overcome other obstacles to widespread adoption of stormwater recycling.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16256264     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  4 in total

1.  An impact assessment for urban stormwater use.

Authors:  Lian Lundy; Michael Revitt; Bryan Ellis
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-29       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Urban stormwater runoff: a new class of environmental flow problem.

Authors:  Christopher J Walsh; Tim D Fletcher; Matthew J Burns
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Methodologies for pre-validation of biofilters and wetlands for stormwater treatment.

Authors:  Kefeng Zhang; Anja Randelovic; Larissa M Aguiar; Declan Page; David T McCarthy; Ana Deletic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Future trends and guidance for the triple bottom line and sustainability: a data driven bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Ming-Lang Tseng; Chia-Hao Chang; Chun-Wei Remen Lin; Kuo-Jui Wu; Qing Chen; Li Xia; Bing Xue
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.223

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.