Literature DB >> 16256101

No-threshold dose-response curves for nongenotoxic chemicals: findings and applications for risk assessment.

Daniel M Sheehan1.   

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that no threshold exists when estradiol acts through the same mechanism as an active endogenous estrogen. A Michaelis-Menten (MM) equation accounting for response saturation, background effects, and endogenous estrogen level fit a turtle sex-reversal data set with no threshold and estimated the endogenous dose. Additionally, 31 diverse literature dose-response data sets were analyzed by adding a term for nonhormonal background; good fits were obtained but endogenous dose estimations were not significant due to low resolving power. No thresholds were observed. Data sets were plotted using a normalized MM equation; all 178 data points were accommodated on a single graph. Response rates from approximately 1% to >95% were well fit. The findings contradict the threshold assumption and low-dose safety. Calculating risk and assuming additivity of effects from multiple chemicals acting through the same mechanism rather than assuming a safe dose for nonthresholded curves is appropriate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16256101     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2005.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  14 in total

Review 1.  Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Theo Colborn; Tyrone B Hayes; Jerrold J Heindel; David R Jacobs; Duk-Hee Lee; Toshi Shioda; Ana M Soto; Frederick S vom Saal; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller; John Peterson Myers
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and public health protection: a statement of principles from The Endocrine Society.

Authors:  R Thomas Zoeller; T R Brown; L L Doan; A C Gore; N E Skakkebaek; A M Soto; T J Woodruff; F S Vom Saal
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 4.736

3.  Policy decisions on endocrine disruptors should be based on science across disciplines: a response to Dietrich et al.

Authors:  A C Gore; J Balthazart; D Bikle; D O Carpenter; D Crews; P Czernichow; E Diamanti-Kandarakis; R M Dores; D Grattan; P R Hof; A N Hollenberg; C Lange; A V Lee; J E Levine; R P Millar; R J Nelson; M Porta; M Poth; D M Power; G S Prins; E C Ridgway; E F Rissman; J A Romijn; P E Sawchenko; P D Sly; O Söder; H S Taylor; M Tena-Sempere; H Vaudry; K Wallen; Z Wang; L Wartofsky; C S Watson
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 4.  Methodological issues in human studies of endocrine disrupting chemicals.

Authors:  Duk-Hee Lee; David R Jacobs
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.514

5.  Non-monotonic dose responses in studies of endocrine disrupting chemicals: bisphenol a as a case study.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 6.  Components of plastic: experimental studies in animals and relevance for human health.

Authors:  Chris E Talsness; Anderson J M Andrade; Sergio N Kuriyama; Julia A Taylor; Frederick S vom Saal
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Update on the Health Effects of Bisphenol A: Overwhelming Evidence of Harm.

Authors:  Frederick S Vom Saal; Laura N Vandenberg
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.736

8.  Long-term effects of environmental endocrine disruptors on reproductive physiology and behavior.

Authors:  Heather B Patisaul; Heather B Adewale
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Application of key events analysis to chemical carcinogens and noncarcinogens.

Authors:  Alan R Boobis; George P Daston; R Julian Preston; Stephen S Olin
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.176

Review 10.  Non-genomic effects of xenoestrogen mixtures.

Authors:  René Viñas; Yow-Jiun Jeng; Cheryl S Watson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.