BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The use of a rectal balloon leads to a protection of the posterior rectal wall in irradiation of prostate cancer. The purpose of this analysis was to quantitatively assess the optimal volume in rectal balloons concerning rectal dose sparing in different clinical target volumes (CTVs) in prostate cancer irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 14 patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing external beam radiotherapy were investigated. The prostate, the entire and the proximal seminal vesicles were delineated as CTV. Treatment plans without a rectal balloon and with a rectal balloon inflated with 40 ml (six patients) or 60 ml air (eight patients) were generated for each CTV and compared concerning rectal dose volume histograms. RESULTS: The use of a rectal balloon filled with 40 ml air led to no significant advantage in radiation exposure of the rectal wall in all CTVs. The use of a rectal balloon filled with 60 ml air resulted in a significant decrease of the exposed rectal wall volume in all CTVs with a reduced estimated risk for chronic toxicity in case of inclusion of the proximal or entire seminal vesicles into the CTV. CONCLUSION: The use of a rectal balloon filled with 60 ml air led to a significantly decreased proportion of the irradiated rectal wall for all CTVs. This volume filled in rectal balloons is therefore recommended for use. In case of irradiation of the prostate without the seminal vesicles, the use of a rectal balloon should be considered carefully concerning the patients' imaginable discomfort using a rectal balloon and a questionable advantage concerning the estimated risk for chronic toxicity.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The use of a rectal balloon leads to a protection of the posterior rectal wall in irradiation of prostate cancer. The purpose of this analysis was to quantitatively assess the optimal volume in rectal balloons concerning rectal dose sparing in different clinical target volumes (CTVs) in prostate cancer irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 14 patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing external beam radiotherapy were investigated. The prostate, the entire and the proximal seminal vesicles were delineated as CTV. Treatment plans without a rectal balloon and with a rectal balloon inflated with 40 ml (six patients) or 60 ml air (eight patients) were generated for each CTV and compared concerning rectal dose volume histograms. RESULTS: The use of a rectal balloon filled with 40 ml air led to no significant advantage in radiation exposure of the rectal wall in all CTVs. The use of a rectal balloon filled with 60 ml air resulted in a significant decrease of the exposed rectal wall volume in all CTVs with a reduced estimated risk for chronic toxicity in case of inclusion of the proximal or entire seminal vesicles into the CTV. CONCLUSION: The use of a rectal balloon filled with 60 ml air led to a significantly decreased proportion of the irradiated rectal wall for all CTVs. This volume filled in rectal balloons is therefore recommended for use. In case of irradiation of the prostate without the seminal vesicles, the use of a rectal balloon should be considered carefully concerning the patients' imaginable discomfort using a rectal balloon and a questionable advantage concerning the estimated risk for chronic toxicity.
Authors: Gregor Goldner; Hans Geinitz; Stefan Wachter; Gerd Becker; Frank Zimmermann; Natascha Wachter-Gerstner; Stefan Glocker; Regina Pötzi; Andre Wambersie; Michael Bamberg; Michael Molls; Horst Feldmann; Richard Pötter Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Annemarie M den Harder; Carla H van Gils; Alexis N T J Kotte; Marco van Vulpen; Irene M Lips Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2014-04-24 Impact factor: 3.621