BACKGROUND: Making an early diagnosis of dementia is becoming increasingly important, but is difficult in practice. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale is a widely used dementia staging instrument, yielding a global score and a summated score (sum of box score). This study examines the utility of the CDR sum of box score, rather than the CDR global score, in making a diagnosis of early dementia. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the CDR sum of box score is predictive of an ICD-10 diagnosis of dementia in cases with mild cognitive deficits. METHODS: Clinical data recorded on our Memory Clinic database were examined for all patients seen over a 6-year period. Data were extracted from 276 first visits in which patients had scored 0.5 using the CDR global score. We examined the relationship between CDR sum of box score and consensus diagnosis of dementia using logistic regression. RESULTS: We found that increased CDR sum of box score was significantly associated with a higher probability of being assigned an ICD-10 diagnosis of dementia (p < 0.001). The odds ratio for the coefficient of CDR sum of box was 2.3 (95% CI 1.7-3.1), indicating that the likelihood of being diagnosed as having dementia increased by a factor of 2.3 for every point increase on the CDR sum of box score. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that the CDR sum of box score provides additional information to the CDR global score in mild cases. The CDR sum of box score is a helpful indicator in making/excluding a diagnosis of dementia in people with mild cognitive deficits. Copyright 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.
BACKGROUND: Making an early diagnosis of dementia is becoming increasingly important, but is difficult in practice. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale is a widely used dementia staging instrument, yielding a global score and a summated score (sum of box score). This study examines the utility of the CDR sum of box score, rather than the CDR global score, in making a diagnosis of early dementia. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the CDR sum of box score is predictive of an ICD-10 diagnosis of dementia in cases with mild cognitive deficits. METHODS: Clinical data recorded on our Memory Clinic database were examined for all patients seen over a 6-year period. Data were extracted from 276 first visits in which patients had scored 0.5 using the CDR global score. We examined the relationship between CDR sum of box score and consensus diagnosis of dementia using logistic regression. RESULTS: We found that increased CDR sum of box score was significantly associated with a higher probability of being assigned an ICD-10 diagnosis of dementia (p < 0.001). The odds ratio for the coefficient of CDR sum of box was 2.3 (95% CI 1.7-3.1), indicating that the likelihood of being diagnosed as having dementia increased by a factor of 2.3 for every point increase on the CDR sum of box score. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that the CDR sum of box score provides additional information to the CDR global score in mild cases. The CDR sum of box score is a helpful indicator in making/excluding a diagnosis of dementia in people with mild cognitive deficits. Copyright 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors: Sid E O'Bryant; Stephen C Waring; C Munro Cullum; James Hall; Laura Lacritz; Paul J Massman; Philip J Lupo; Joan S Reisch; Rachelle Doody Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2008-08
Authors: Carrie R McDonald; Lusineh Gharapetian; Linda K McEvoy; Christine Fennema-Notestine; Donald J Hagler; Dominic Holland; Anders M Dale Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2010-05-14 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Young Noh; Seun Jeon; Jong Min Lee; Sang Won Seo; Geon Ha Kim; Hanna Cho; Byoung Seok Ye; Cindy W Yoon; Hee Jin Kim; Juhee Chin; Kee Hyung Park; Kenneth M Heilman; Duk L Na Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-10-24 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: C R McDonald; L K McEvoy; L Gharapetian; C Fennema-Notestine; D J Hagler; D Holland; A Koyama; J B Brewer; A M Dale Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-08-11 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Stephen T Moelter; Megan A Glenn; Sharon X Xie; Jesse Chittams; Christopher M Clark; Marianne Watson; Steven E Arnold Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2015 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Alex D Leow; Igor Yanovsky; Neelroop Parikshak; Xue Hua; Suh Lee; Arthur W Toga; Clifford R Jack; Matt A Bernstein; Paula J Britson; Jeffrey L Gunter; Chadwick P Ward; Bret Borowski; Leslie M Shaw; John Q Trojanowski; Adam S Fleisher; Danielle Harvey; John Kornak; Norbert Schuff; Gene E Alexander; Michael W Weiner; Paul M Thompson Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-04-15 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Eseosa T Ighodaro; Erin L Abner; David W Fardo; Ai-Ling Lin; Yuriko Katsumata; Frederick A Schmitt; Richard J Kryscio; Gregory A Jicha; Janna H Neltner; Sarah E Monsell; Walter A Kukull; Debra K Moser; Frank Appiah; Adam D Bachstetter; Linda J Van Eldik; Peter T Nelson Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2016-01-06 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Deborah A Lowe; Steve Balsis; Tyler M Miller; Jared F Benge; Rachelle S Doody Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2012 Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: Michael A Rapp; Michal Schnaider-Beeri; Dushyant P Purohit; Abraham Reichenberg; Susan R McGurk; Vahram Haroutunian; Philip D Harvey Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.939