Literature DB >> 16254414

Time-lapse analysis reveals a series of events by which cranial neural crest cells reroute around physical barriers.

Paul M Kulesa1, Carole C Lu, Scott E Fraser.   

Abstract

Segmentation is crucial to the development of the vertebrate body plan. Underlying segmentation in the head is further revealed when cranial neural crest cells emerge from even numbered rhombomeres in the hindbrain to form three stereotypical migratory streams that lead to the peripheral branchial arches. To test the role of intrinsic versus extrinsic cues in influencing an individual cell's trajectory, we implanted physical barriers in the chick mesoderm, distal to emerging neural crest cell stream fronts. We analyzed the spatio-temporal dynamics as individual neural crest cells encountered and responded to the barriers, using time-lapse confocal imaging. We find the majority of neural crest cells reach the branchial arch destinations following a repeatable series of events by which the cells overcome the barriers. Even though the lead cells become temporarily blocked by a barrier, cells that follow from behind find a novel pathway around a barrier and become de novo leaders of a new stream. Surprisingly, quantitative analyses of cell trajectories show that cells that encounter an r3 barrier migrate significantly faster but less directly than cells that encounter an r4 barrier, which migrate normally. Interestingly, we also find that cells temporarily blocked by the barrier migrate slightly faster and change direction more often. In addition, we show that cells can be forced to migrate into normally repulsive territory. These results suggest that cranial neural crest cell trajectories are not intrinsically determined, that cells can respond to minor alterations in the environment and re-target a peripheral destination, and that both intrinsic and extrinsic cues are important in patterning. Copyright (c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16254414     DOI: 10.1159/000088129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  4 in total

1.  Neuropilin-1 interacts with the second branchial arch microenvironment to mediate chick neural crest cell dynamics.

Authors:  Rebecca McLennan; Paul M Kulesa
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.780

Review 2.  Cranial neural crest migration: new rules for an old road.

Authors:  Paul M Kulesa; Caleb M Bailey; Jennifer C Kasemeier-Kulesa; Rebecca McLennan
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 3.  Neural crest and cancer: Divergent travelers on similar paths.

Authors:  Kristin L Gallik; Randall W Treffy; Lynne M Nacke; Kamil Ahsan; Manuel Rocha; Abigail Green-Saxena; Ankur Saxena
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 1.882

4.  Computational modelling of cell chain migration reveals mechanisms that sustain follow-the-leader behaviour.

Authors:  Michelle L Wynn; Paul M Kulesa; Santiago Schnell
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 4.118

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.