Literature DB >> 16253972

Trends in embryo transfer practices and multiple gestation for IVF procedures in the USA, 1996-2002.

M A Reynolds1, L A Schieve.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasing use of IVF in the USA has been a major contributor to the rising national multiple birth rate. Many have advocated that reducing the number of embryos transferred is essential for addressing the IVF-associated multiple birth problem.
METHODS: A population-based sample of 506 072 IVF transfers performed in the USA in 1996-2002 was used to investigate trends in embryo transfer practices and to determine whether any changes in practice patterns have impacted the multiple gestation risk associated with IVF.
RESULTS: The proportion of procedures in which >or=3 embryos were transferred declined significantly for most patient groups between 1996 and 2002. However, declines for some groups were not sizeable (from 79 to 73% and from 76 to 71% for fresh, non-donor procedures among women aged 38-40 and 41-42 years respectively) and transferring >or=3 embryos remained the norm for all groups. As of 2002, single embryo transfer had not increased for most groups and remained uncommon. Some declines in overall multiple gestation rates were observed, although multiple gestation risk associated with 2 embryos transferred increased significantly for all groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite changes in embryo transfer practices, multiple gestation risk remains high, in part due to increased multiple gestation rates associated with the transfer of two embryos.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16253972     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dei363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  9 in total

1.  Comparing patients' and clinicians' perceptions of elective single embryo transfer using the attitudes to a twin IVF pregnancy scale (ATIPS).

Authors:  Vibha Rai; Amanda Betsworth; Charlotte Beer; George Ndukwe; Cris Glazebrook
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Application of a validated prediction model for in vitro fertilization: comparison of live birth rates and multiple birth rates with 1 embryo transferred over 2 cycles vs 2 embryos in 1 cycle.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Judy E Stern; Valerie L Baker; Eric Widra; Charles C Coddington; William E Gibbons; Bradley J Van Voorhis; G David Ball
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  The multiple birth epidemic: revisited.

Authors:  Sarit Avraham; Daniel S Seidman
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2012-08

4.  Adverse pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization: effect of number of embryos transferred and plurality at conception.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern; Milton Kotelchuck; Eugene R Declercq; Mark D Hornstein; Daksha Gopal; Lan Hoang; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  In vitro fertilization and multiple pregnancies: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-10-01

6.  Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2015.

Authors:  Saswati Sunderam; Dmitry M Kissin; Sara B Crawford; Suzanne G Folger; Sheree L Boulet; Lee Warner; Wanda D Barfield
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2018-02-16

7.  Multivariate analysis of the factors associated with live births during in vitro fertilisation in Southeast Asia: a cross-sectional study of 104,015 in vitro fertilisation records in Taiwan.

Authors:  Hsi-Cheng Yu; Wen-May Rei; Shu-Ti Chiou; Chung-Yeh Deng
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.357

8.  Perinatal mortality following assisted reproductive technology treatment in Australia and New Zealand, a public health approach for international reporting of perinatal mortality.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Sullivan; Yueping A Wang; Robert J Norman; Georgina M Chambers; Abrar Ahmad Chughtai; Cynthia M Farquhar
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2014.

Authors:  Saswati Sunderam; Dmitry M Kissin; Sara B Crawford; Suzanne G Folger; Denise J Jamieson; Lee Warner; Wanda D Barfield
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2017-02-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.