Literature DB >> 16253595

Gemfibrozil reduces small low-density lipoprotein more in normolipemic subjects classified as low-density lipoprotein pattern B compared with pattern A.

H Robert Superko1, Kaspar K Berneis, Paul T Williams, Manfredi Rizzo, Peter D Wood.   

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that gemfibrozil has a differential effect on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) subclass distributions and postprandial lipemia that is different in subjects classified as having LDL subclass pattern A or LDL pattern B who do not have a classic lipid disorder. Forty-three normolipemic subjects were randomized to gemfibrozil (1,200 mg/day) or placebo for 12 weeks. Lipids and lipoproteins were determined by enzymatic methods. The mass concentrations of lipoproteins in plasma were determined by analytic ultracentrifugation and included the S(f) intervals: 20 to 400 (very LDL), 12 to 20 (intermediate-density lipoprotein), 0 to 12 (LDL), and HDL(2) mass (F(1.20) 3.5 to 9.0) and HDL(3) mass (F(1.20) 0 to 3.5). Postprandial measurements of triglycerides and lipoprotein(a) were taken after the patients consumed a 500 kcal/M(2) test meal. Treatment with gemfibrozil, compared with placebo, significantly reduced fasting plasma triglycerides (difference from placebo +/- SE; -50.2 +/- 20.6 mg/dl, p = 0.02), total cholesterol (-16.4 +/- 7.5 mg/dl, p = 0.04), apolipoprotein B (-16.1 +/- 5.5 mg/dl, p = 0.006), very LDL mass of S(f) 20 to 400 (-50.8 +/- 24.1 mg/dl, p = 0.02), S(f) 20 to 60 (-17.5 +/- 8.5 mg/dl, p = 0.05), S(f) 60 to 100 (-16.2 +/- 8.1 mg/dl, p = 0.05), and increased peak S(F) (0.48 +/- 0.27 Svedberg, p = 0.08). Gemfibrozil reduced the postprandial triglyceride level significantly at 3 (p = 0.04) and 4 (p = 0.05) hours after the test meal. A significantly different subclass response to gemfibrozil was observed in those with LDL pattern A versus B. Those with LDL pattern B had a significantly greater reduction in the small LDL mass S(f) 0 to 7 (p = 0.04), specifically regions S(f) 0 to 3 (p = 0.009) and S(f) 3 to 5 (p = 0.009). In conclusion, normolipemic subjects with either predominantly dense or buoyant LDL respond differently to gemfibrozil as determined by the changes in LDL subclass distribution. Thus, treatment with gemfibrozil may have additional antiatherogenic effects in those with LDL pattern B by decreasing small dense LDL that is not apparent in those with pattern A.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16253595     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.06.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

Review 1.  Is it LDL particle size or number that correlates with risk for cardiovascular disease?

Authors:  H Robert Superko; Radhika R Gadesam
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Gemfibrozil, food and drug administration-approved lipid-lowering drug, increases longevity in mouse model of late infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis.

Authors:  Arunava Ghosh; Suresh Babu Rangasamy; Khushbu K Modi; Kalipada Pahan
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 5.372

3.  Atherogenic low density lipoprotein phenotype in long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Jyoti Malhotra; Emily S Tonorezos; Marina Rozenberg; Gloria L Vega; Charles A Sklar; Joanne Chou; Chaya S Moskowitz; Debra A Eshelman-Kent; Peter Janiszewski; Robert Ross; Kevin C Oeffinger
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 5.922

4.  The effects of liposuction removal of subcutaneous abdominal fat on lipid metabolism are independent of insulin sensitivity in normal-overweight individuals.

Authors:  J Ybarra; F Blanco-Vaca; S Fernández; A Castellví; R Bonet; X Palomer; J Ordóñez-Llanos; A Trius; R Vila-Rovira; A Pérez
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-02-09       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 5.  Small Dense Low-Density Lipoprotein as Biomarker for Atherosclerotic Diseases.

Authors:  Ekaterina A Ivanova; Veronika A Myasoedova; Alexandra A Melnichenko; Andrey V Grechko; Alexander N Orekhov
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2017-05-07       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 6.  Does inflammation determine whether obesity is metabolically healthy or unhealthy? The aging perspective.

Authors:  Iftikhar Alam; Tze Pin Ng; Anis Larbi
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 4.711

Review 7.  Update on the use of fibrates: focus on bezafibrate.

Authors:  Ilan Goldenberg; Michal Benderly; Uri Goldbourt
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2008

Review 8.  Lipoprotein subfractions in metabolic syndrome and obesity: clinical significance and therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Dragana Nikolic; Niki Katsiki; Giuseppe Montalto; Esma R Isenovic; Dimitri P Mikhailidis; Manfredi Rizzo
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 5.717

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.