Literature DB >> 16253522

Enhancing BOLD response in the auditory system by neurophysiologically tuned fMRI sequence.

Erich Seifritz1, Francesco Di Salle, Fabrizio Esposito, Marcus Herdener, John G Neuhoff, Klaus Scheffler.   

Abstract

Auditory neuroscience has not tapped fMRI's full potential because of acoustic scanner noise emitted by the gradient switches of conventional echoplanar fMRI sequences. The scanner noise is pulsed, and auditory cortex is particularly sensitive to pulsed sounds. Current fMRI approaches to avoid stimulus-noise interactions are temporally inefficient. Since the sustained BOLD response to pulsed sounds decreases with repetition rate and becomes minimal with unpulsed sounds, we developed an fMRI sequence emitting continuous rather than pulsed gradient sound by implementing a novel quasi-continuous gradient switch pattern. Compared to conventional fMRI, continuous-sound fMRI reduced auditory cortex BOLD baseline and increased BOLD amplitude with graded sound stimuli, short sound events, and sounds as complex as orchestra music with preserved temporal resolution. Response in subcortical auditory nuclei was enhanced, but not the response to light in visual cortex. Finally, tonotopic mapping using continuous-sound fMRI demonstrates that enhanced functional signal-to-noise in BOLD response translates into improved spatial separability of specific sound representations.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16253522     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  34 in total

1.  Effect of fMRI acoustic noise on non-auditory working memory task: comparison between continuous and pulsed sound emitting EPI.

Authors:  Sven Haller; Andreas J Bartsch; Ernst W Radue; Markus Klarhöfer; Erich Seifritz; Klaus Scheffler
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Silent and continuous fMRI scanning differentially modulate activation in an auditory language comprehension task.

Authors:  Conny F Schmidt; Tino Zaehle; Martin Meyer; Eveline Geiser; Peter Boesiger; Lutz Jancke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Brain responses to auditory and visual stimulus offset: shared representations of temporal edges.

Authors:  Marcus Herdener; Christoph Lehmann; Fabrizio Esposito; Francesco di Salle; Andrea Federspiel; Dominik R Bach; Klaus Scheffler; Erich Seifritz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Pitfalls in FMRI.

Authors:  Sven Haller; Andreas J Bartsch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Neural correlates of pre-attentive processing of pattern deviance in professional musicians.

Authors:  Benedikt Habermeyer; Marcus Herdener; Fabrizio Esposito; Caroline C Hilti; Markus Klarhöfer; Francesco di Salle; Stephan Wetzel; Klaus Scheffler; Katja Cattapan-Ludewig; Erich Seifritz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Neuronal modulation of auditory attention by informative and uninformative spatial cues.

Authors:  Andrew R Mayer; Alexandre R Franco; Deborah L Harrington
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Silent echo-planar imaging for auditory FMRI.

Authors:  S Schmitter; E Diesch; M Amann; A Kroll; M Moayer; L R Schad
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 8.  Psychophysics and neuronal bases of sound localization in humans.

Authors:  Jyrki Ahveninen; Norbert Kopčo; Iiro P Jääskeläinen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Acoustic noise reduction in pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL).

Authors:  Johan N van der Meer; Dennis F R Heijtel; Guus van Hest; Geert-Jan Plattèl; Matthijs J P van Osch; Eus J W van Someren; Ed T vanBavel; Aart J Nederveen
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  The neural networks underlying auditory sensory gating.

Authors:  A R Mayer; F M Hanlon; A R Franco; T M Teshiba; R J Thoma; V P Clark; J M Canive
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.