Literature DB >> 16253278

Effect of ischemic preconditioning on cerebral blood flow after subsequent lethal ischemia in gerbils.

Hidenori Nakamura1, Toshiya Katsumata, Yutaka Nishiyama, Tatsuo Otori, Ken-ichiro Katsura, Yasuo Katayama.   

Abstract

Ischemic tolerance, the phenomenon where a sublethal ischemic preconditioning protects the brain against a subsequent lethal ischemia, has been widely studied. Studies have been done on cerebral blood flow levels prior to the lethal ischemia, but the hemodynamic pattern after global ischemia with ischemic preconditioning has not been reported. Sequential changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in gerbil hippocampus after 5 min global ischemia with or without 2 min ischemic preconditioning were studied to determine if ischemic preconditioning affects rCBF. Four different treatments were given: (1) sham-operated, (2) 2 min ischemia, (3) non-preconditioned, and (4) preconditioned. Groups (1) and (2) (both groups n = 5) were given a 24-h recovery period and the rCBF was measured for baseline values. 24 h after sham-operation (3) and 2 min ischemia (4), gerbils were subjected to 5 min ischemia followed by 1 h, 6 h, 1-day or 7-day reperfusion periods (all groups n = 5). Although no regional difference was observed in the recovery pattern of rCBF, the values of rCBF were significantly higher in the preconditioned group throughout whole brain regions including hippocampus. These results indicate that ischemic preconditioning facilitated the recovery of rCBF after 5 min global ischemia. It needs further study to determine whether the protecting effects of preconditioning relate to the early recovery of rCBF or not. However, our results could be interpreted that the early recovery of rCBF may lead to benefits for cell survival in the CA1 neuron, probably facilitating other protecting mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16253278     DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Life Sci        ISSN: 0024-3205            Impact factor:   5.037


  16 in total

Review 1.  Ischemic tolerance as an active and intrinsic neuroprotective mechanism.

Authors:  R Anne Stetler; Feng Zhang; Collin Liu; Jun Chen
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2009

2.  The interferon response as a common final pathway for many preconditioning stimuli: unexpected crosstalk between hypoxic adaptation and antiviral defense.

Authors:  Saravanan S Karuppagounder; Yujia Zhai; Yingxin Chen; Rongrong He; Rajiv R Ratan
Journal:  Cond Med       Date:  2018-06-15

3.  Neuroprotection of Ischemic Preconditioning is Mediated by Anti-inflammatory, Not Pro-inflammatory, Cytokines in the Gerbil Hippocampus Induced by a Subsequent Lethal Transient Cerebral Ischemia.

Authors:  Dong Won Kim; Jae-Chul Lee; Jeong-Hwi Cho; Joon Ha Park; Ji Hyeon Ahn; Bai Hui Chen; Bich-Na Shin; Hyun-Jin Tae; Jeong Yeol Seo; Jun Hwi Cho; Il Jun Kang; Seongkweon Hong; Young-Myeong Kim; Moo-Ho Won; In Hye Kim
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.996

4.  Endothelial nitric oxide synthase mediates endogenous protection against subarachnoid hemorrhage-induced cerebral vasospasm.

Authors:  Ananth K Vellimana; Eric Milner; Tej D Azad; Michael D Harries; Meng-Liang Zhou; Jeffrey M Gidday; Byung Hee Han; Gregory J Zipfel
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  p63 Expression in the Gerbil Hippocampus Following Transient Ischemia and Effect of Ischemic Preconditioning on p63 Expression in the Ischemic Hippocampus.

Authors:  Jae-Chul Lee; Geum-Sil Cho; In Hye Kim; Joon Ha Park; Jeong-Hwi Cho; Ji Hyeon Ahn; Eun Joo Bae; Ji Yun Ahn; Chan Woo Park; Jun Hwi Cho; Young-Myeong Kim; Moo-Ho Won; Hui Young Lee
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.996

6.  Remote Ischemic Conditioning Alters Methylation and Expression of Cell Cycle Genes in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Elina Nikkola; Azim Laiwalla; Arthur Ko; Marcus Alvarez; Mark Connolly; Yinn Cher Ooi; William Hsu; Alex Bui; Päivi Pajukanta; Nestor R Gonzalez
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Neurovascular protection by ischemic tolerance: role of nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  Alexander Kunz; Laibaik Park; Takato Abe; Eduardo F Gallo; Josef Anrather; Ping Zhou; Costantino Iadecola
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Brain ischemic preconditioning protects against moderate, not severe, transient global cerebral ischemic injury.

Authors:  Jae-Chul Lee; Bich-Na Shin; Jeong Hwi Cho; Tae-Kyeong Lee; In Hye Kim; YooHun Noh; Sung-Su Kim; Hyang-Ah Lee; Young-Myeong Kim; Hyeyoung Kim; Jun Hwi Cho; Joon Ha Park; Ji Hyeon Ahn; Il Jun Kang; In Koo Hwang; Moo-Ho Won; Myoung Cheol Shin
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.584

9.  Phase I clinical trial for the feasibility and safety of remote ischemic conditioning for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Nestor R Gonzalez; Mark Connolly; Joshua R Dusick; Harshal Bhakta; Paul Vespa
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 10.  Biomarkers for ischemic preconditioning: finding the responders.

Authors:  Sebastian Koch; David Della-Morte; Kunjan R Dave; Ralph L Sacco; Miguel A Perez-Pinzon
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 6.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.