Literature DB >> 16253082

Evaluation of long-term implant success.

Devorah Schwartz-Arad1, Ran Herzberg, Liran Levin.   

Abstract

Implant success criteria, regarding marginal bone loss and other parameters, were first suggested in 1986 and today are still frequently referred to as the gold standard for implant success. However, according to the recent abundance of data on marginal bone loss and a better understanding of bone and soft tissue behavior around the implant neck and body, these criteria are inaccurate for the wide variety of implant systems. The purpose of this article is to review some of the relevant literature regarding marginal bone loss and to propose guidelines for a novel approach to evaluate the long-term success of implants regarding marginal bone loss. Four hypothetical patterns of implant marginal bone loss after the first year are suggested: a low-rate marginal bone loss over the years (Albrektsson's pattern); low-rate marginal bone loss in the first few years followed by a rapid loss of bone support; high-rate marginal bone loss in the first few years followed by almost no bone loss; and continuous high-rate marginal bone loss leading to a complete loss of bone support.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16253082     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.10.1623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  11 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review on the long-term success of calcium phosphate plasma-spray-coated dental implants.

Authors:  B A J A van Oirschot; E M Bronkhorst; J J J P van den Beucken; G J Meijer; J A Jansen; R Junker
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 2.  Imaging technology in implant diagnosis.

Authors:  Christos Angelopoulos; Tara Aghaloo
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2011-01

3.  Correlations between clinical parameters in implant maintenance patients: analysis among healthy and history-of-periodontitis groups.

Authors:  Keisuke Seki; Shinya Nakabayashi; Naoki Tanabe; Atsushi Kamimoto; Yoshiyuki Hagiwara
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-10-30

4.  Comparative evaluation of the stability of two different dental implant designs and surgical protocols-a pilot study.

Authors:  David E Simmons; Pooja Maney; Austin G Teitelbaum; Susan Billiot; Lomesh J Popat; A Archontia Palaiologou
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-05-02

5.  Retrospective study of the success of dental implants placed in HIV-positive patients.

Authors:  Nadine Cordero Rubinstein; Zhimon Jacobson; Gail Link McCausland; Serge Dibart
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2019-06-13

6.  A Possible Relationship between Peri-Implantitis, Titanium Hypersensitivity, and External Tooth Resorption: Metal-Free Alternative to Titanium Implants.

Authors:  Andrea Enrico Borgonovo; Rachele Censi; Virna Vavassori; Mauro Savio; Dino Re
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2021-01-22

7.  Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Brånemark Implants with an Anodized Surface following Seven-to-Eight Years of Functional Loading.

Authors:  David Gelb; Bradley McAllister; Pirkka Nummikoski; Massimo Del Fabbro
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2013-03-07

8.  Effect of platform switching on the peri-implant bone: A finite element study.

Authors:  Kheira Bouazza-Juanes; Amparo Martínez-González; Germán Peiró; Juan-José Ródenas; María-Victoria López-Mollá
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2015-10-01

Review 9.  Dealing with dental implant failures.

Authors:  Liran Levin
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

10.  Evaluation of peri-implant soft tissue and bone levels around early loaded implant in restoring single missing tooth: A clinico-radiographic study.

Authors:  Isha Bhardwaj; Anoop Bhushan; Chandrababu Sudha Baiju; Shweta Bali; Vaibhav Joshi
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.