OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale for elderly people (IADL-E) to use in conjunction with cognitive screening tests for dementia in an educationally and socioculturally heterogeneous population. METHOD: Eleven IADL items were selected and weighted for major factors causing heterogeneity in the population--gender, education, social (rural/urban) setting and age. Each item was rated for its applicability (yes/no), degree of disability (scored from 0 to 2) and causative impairment (cognitive and/or physical). From this a composite index of cognitive (CDI) or physical (PDI) disability was derived. Validation was performed retrospectively on 240 subjects: 135 without and 105 with dementia by DSM-IV. RESULTS: The IADL-E had a high internal consistency (alpha = 0.95). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.97 (CI = 0.94-0.99). A cutoff score of 16 on CDI provided a sensitivity of 0.91, specificity 0.99 and positive predictive value 0.76 (at 5% base rate). IADL-E correlated highly with clinical (DSM-IV, kappa = 0.89), functional (CDR, 0.82) and cognitive (Mini-mental Status Examination, MMSE, 0.74) diagnoses. It showed good responsiveness, with the change on CDI over a median of 23 months correlating significantly with that on MMSE (coefficient = -0.382, CI = -0.667 to -0.098; p=0.009). Individual items had good interrater and test-retest reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The IADL-E is a reliable, sensitive and responsive scale of functional abilities useful in dementia screening in a socioculturally heterogeneous population.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale for elderly people (IADL-E) to use in conjunction with cognitive screening tests for dementia in an educationally and socioculturally heterogeneous population. METHOD: Eleven IADL items were selected and weighted for major factors causing heterogeneity in the population--gender, education, social (rural/urban) setting and age. Each item was rated for its applicability (yes/no), degree of disability (scored from 0 to 2) and causative impairment (cognitive and/or physical). From this a composite index of cognitive (CDI) or physical (PDI) disability was derived. Validation was performed retrospectively on 240 subjects: 135 without and 105 with dementia by DSM-IV. RESULTS: The IADL-E had a high internal consistency (alpha = 0.95). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.97 (CI = 0.94-0.99). A cutoff score of 16 on CDI provided a sensitivity of 0.91, specificity 0.99 and positive predictive value 0.76 (at 5% base rate). IADL-E correlated highly with clinical (DSM-IV, kappa = 0.89), functional (CDR, 0.82) and cognitive (Mini-mental Status Examination, MMSE, 0.74) diagnoses. It showed good responsiveness, with the change on CDI over a median of 23 months correlating significantly with that on MMSE (coefficient = -0.382, CI = -0.667 to -0.098; p=0.009). Individual items had good interrater and test-retest reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The IADL-E is a reliable, sensitive and responsive scale of functional abilities useful in dementia screening in a socioculturally heterogeneous population.
Authors: Edmond Teng; Brian W Becker; Ellen Woo; David S Knopman; Jeffrey L Cummings; Po H Lu Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2010 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Kate Williams; Anja Frei; Anders Vetsch; Fabienne Dobbels; Milo A Puhan; Katja Rüdell Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2012-03-13 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: P S Mathuranath; P Joseph Cherian; Robert Mathew; Suresh Kumar; Annamma George; Aley Alexander; Neelima Ranjith; P S Sarma Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: P S Mathuranath; Annamma George; Neelima Ranjith; Sunita Justus; M Suresh Kumar; Ramsekhar Menon; P Shankara Sarma; Joe Verghese Journal: Neurol India Date: 2012 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.117