Literature DB >> 16252012

Physicians' refusal to resuscitate at borderline gestational age.

Mark R Mercurio1.   

Abstract

Most neonatologists believe there is a minimal gestational age, below which it is appropriate to refuse to provide resuscitation or intensive care. Determination of this threshold should involve knowledge of the outcome data, but also an understanding of the potential for misuse of these data. In particular, there is a risk of deception, of the parents and of ourselves, due to the uncertainty of the true gestational age, and the "self-fulfilling prophecy" that may occur when a center refuses to try below a certain gestational age because they have had no survivors below that age. Finally, any refusal to treat requires ethical justification. Concepts such as futility and patient's best interest should play a role in the determination of the gestational age threshold, applied in light of the data's inherent weaknesses. Journal of Perinatology (2005) 25, 685-689. doi:10.1038/sj.jp.7211395.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16252012     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  3 in total

1.  Prognostication in neurocritical care: just crystal ball gazing?

Authors:  Erwin J O Kompanje
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  The self-fulfilling prophecy in intensive care.

Authors:  Dominic Wilkinson
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2009

3.  Antenatal Assessment of the Prognosis of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Ethical Considerations and Impact for the Management.

Authors:  Kévin Le Duc; Sébastien Mur; Dyuti Sharma; Rony Sfeir; Pascal Vaast; Mohamed Riadh Boukhris; Alexandra Benachi; Laurent Storme
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.