Literature DB >> 16251438

The temporal impulse response underlying saccadic decisions.

Casimir J H Ludwig1, Iain D Gilchrist, Eugene McSorley, Roland J Baddeley.   

Abstract

Models of perceptual decision making often assume that sensory evidence is accumulated over time in favor of the various possible decisions, until the evidence in favor of one of them outweighs the evidence for the others. Saccadic eye movements are among the most frequent perceptual decisions that the human brain performs. We used stochastic visual stimuli to identify the temporal impulse response underlying saccadic eye movement decisions. Observers performed a contrast search task, with temporal variability in the visual signals. In experiment 1, we derived the temporal filter observers used to integrate the visual information. The integration window was restricted to the first approximately 100 ms after display onset. In experiment 2, we showed that observers cannot perform the task if there is no useful information to distinguish the target from the distractor within this time epoch. We conclude that (1) observers did not integrate sensory evidence up to a criterion level, (2) observers did not integrate visual information up to the start of the saccadic dead time, and (3) variability in saccade latency does not correspond to variability in the visual integration period. Instead, our results support a temporal filter model of saccadic decision making. The temporal impulse response identified by our methods corresponds well with estimates of integration times of V1 output neurons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16251438      PMCID: PMC6725572          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2197-05.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  35 in total

1.  The urgency-gating model can explain the effects of early evidence.

Authors:  Matthew A Carland; David Thura; Paul Cisek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

2.  Linking neuronal and behavioral performance in a reaction-time visual detection task.

Authors:  Chris Palmer; Shao-Ying Cheng; Eyal Seidemann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The spatial scale of attention strongly modulates saccade latencies.

Authors:  Mark R Harwood; Laurent Madelain; Richard J Krauzlis; Josh Wallman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Temporal precision of neuronal information in a rapid perceptual judgment.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Ghose; Ian T Harrison
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Foveal analysis and peripheral selection during active visual sampling.

Authors:  Casimir J H Ludwig; J Rhys Davies; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Saccade target selection relies on feedback competitive signal integration.

Authors:  Joke P Kalisvaart; André J Noest; Albert V van den Berg; Jeroen Goossens
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Timing of saccadic eye movements during visual search for multiple targets.

Authors:  Chia-Chien Wu; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Antisaccade cost is modulated by contextual experience of location probability.

Authors:  Chia-Lun Liu; Hui-Yan Chiau; Philip Tseng; Daisy L Hung; Ovid J L Tzeng; Neil G Muggleton; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Decisions in changing conditions: the urgency-gating model.

Authors:  Paul Cisek; Geneviève Aude Puskas; Stephany El-Murr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Integrated Bayesian models of learning and decision making for saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Kay H Brodersen; Will D Penny; Lee M Harrison; Jean Daunizeau; Christian C Ruff; Emrah Duzel; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2008-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.