Literature DB >> 16250777

Working despite pain: factors associated with work attendance versus dysfunction.

S J Linton1, N Buer.   

Abstract

A cross-sectional investigation of psychosocial variables in 63 female employees matched for experienced pain was conducted to study the difference between back pain sufferers who were working (Copers) and those who were off work (Dysfunctional). The subjects reported moderate to severe pain often or always during the past year and were employed at the same hospital. Thirty-seven women who had not been off work for pain made up the Copers group, whereas 26 women who had been off work for their pain made up the Dysfunctional group. Subjects were interviewed and completed a battery of questionnaires designed to penetrate level of dysfunction, perceived health, work and social satisfaction, perceived workload, coping strategies, and pain beliefs. Multiple covariate analyses that controlled for perceived workload, smoking, low-back mobility, and obesity revealed significant differences between the groups on levels of functioning, pain beliefs, and coping strategies used. Dysfunctional subjects had stronger beliefs that pain was directly related to activities that they had little control over their pain, that their health was poor, and that they tended to focus more on their pain. A discriminant analysis correctly classified 83% of the subjects as to work status based on six psychosocial variables. These results not only demonstrate the importance of psychosocial factors in back pain, but underscore the fact that work absence for back pain may he controlled by psychological factors related to beliefs and coping strategies. Future research may attempt to use these factors in the screening of patients.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 16250777     DOI: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0203_4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Behav Med        ISSN: 1070-5503


  15 in total

1.  A prospective study of work perceptions and psychosocial factors affecting the report of back injury.

Authors:  S J Bigos; M C Battié; D M Spengler; L D Fisher; W E Fordyce; T H Hansson; A L Nachemson; M D Wortley
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The use of pain coping strategies by patients with phantom limb pain.

Authors:  A Hill
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Pain-specific beliefs, perceived symptom severity, and adjustment to chronic pain.

Authors:  M P Jensen; P Karoly
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  The Duke Health Profile. A 17-item measure of health and dysfunction.

Authors:  G R Parkerson; W E Broadhead; C K Tse
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 5.  Coping with chronic pain: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Judith A Turner; Joan M Romano; Paul Karoly
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  The Distress and Risk Assessment Method. A simple patient classification to identify distress and evaluate the risk of poor outcome.

Authors:  C J Main; P L Wood; S Hollis; C C Spanswick; G Waddell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ).

Authors:  C J Main
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Chronic pain and functional impairment: assessing beliefs about their relationship.

Authors:  J F Riley; D K Ahern; M J Follick
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  The secondary prevention of low back pain: a controlled study with follow-up.

Authors:  Steven J Linton; Laurence A Bradley; Irene Jensen; Erik Spangfort; Lennart Sundell
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Perceptions of disability and occupational stress as discriminators of work disability in patients with chronic pain.

Authors:  M Feuerstein; R W Thebarge
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1991-09
View more
  3 in total

1.  Staying at work with chronic nonspecific musculoskeletal pain: a qualitative study of workers' experiences.

Authors:  Haitze J de Vries; Sandra Brouwer; Johan W Groothoff; Jan H B Geertzen; Michiel F Reneman
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Self-Reported and Tested Function in Health Care Workers with Musculoskeletal Disorders on Full, Partial or Not on Sick Leave.

Authors:  Tove Ask; Jan Sture Skouen; Jörg Assmus; Alice Kvåle
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-09

3.  The association between multisite musculoskeletal pain and cardiac autonomic modulation during work, leisure and sleep - a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Tatiana de Oliveira Sato; David M Hallman; Jesper Kristiansen; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.362

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.