BACKGROUND: Based on the association between the neutrophil and ventilator-induced lung injury, the authors hypothesized that neutrophil inhibition with fucoidin would be beneficial and stimulation with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) would be harmful in a rat model of lethal ventilator-induced lung injury. METHODS: Animals (n = 111) were randomly assigned to be pretreated with fucoidin, G-CSF, or placebo (control) before 4 h of low-tidal-volume (10 ml/kg) or high-tidal-volume (40 ml/kg) mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: All low-volume animals survived. With high volumes, compared with controls, fucoidin did not improve survival (3 of 20 control animals and 5 of 20 fucoidin animals died; P = 0.51) but G-CSF significantly worsened it (18 of 22 animals died; P < 0.001). Circulating neutrophils were increased early with G-CSF and late with fucoidin with low and high tidal volumes (P < 0.05 for each treatment and tidal volume). Fucoidin decreased lung neutrophils, but these were only significant with high tidal volumes, whereas G-CSF increased lung neutrophils but only significantly with low tidal volumes (P < or = 0.01 for each). Fucoidin did not alter any cardiopulmonary measure significantly. Compared with control, G-CSF increased airway pressures with high tidal volumes and worsened lung edema and arterial oxygen with both tidal volumes (P < 0.05 for each). CONCLUSIONS: In this model, neutrophil stimulation by G-CSF increased lung dysfunction and with high tidal volumes worsened survival rates. Extrapolated clinically, neutrophil stimulation either by agents such as G-CSF or conditions such as sepsis may aggravate ventilator-induced lung injury.
BACKGROUND: Based on the association between the neutrophil and ventilator-induced lung injury, the authors hypothesized that neutrophil inhibition with fucoidin would be beneficial and stimulation with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) would be harmful in a rat model of lethal ventilator-induced lung injury. METHODS: Animals (n = 111) were randomly assigned to be pretreated with fucoidin, G-CSF, or placebo (control) before 4 h of low-tidal-volume (10 ml/kg) or high-tidal-volume (40 ml/kg) mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: All low-volume animals survived. With high volumes, compared with controls, fucoidin did not improve survival (3 of 20 control animals and 5 of 20 fucoidin animals died; P = 0.51) but G-CSF significantly worsened it (18 of 22 animals died; P < 0.001). Circulating neutrophils were increased early with G-CSF and late with fucoidin with low and high tidal volumes (P < 0.05 for each treatment and tidal volume). Fucoidin decreased lung neutrophils, but these were only significant with high tidal volumes, whereas G-CSF increased lung neutrophils but only significantly with low tidal volumes (P < or = 0.01 for each). Fucoidin did not alter any cardiopulmonary measure significantly. Compared with control, G-CSF increased airway pressures with high tidal volumes and worsened lung edema and arterial oxygen with both tidal volumes (P < 0.05 for each). CONCLUSIONS: In this model, neutrophil stimulation by G-CSF increased lung dysfunction and with high tidal volumes worsened survival rates. Extrapolated clinically, neutrophil stimulation either by agents such as G-CSF or conditions such as sepsis may aggravate ventilator-induced lung injury.
Authors: Holger C Müller; Katharina Hellwig; Simone Rosseau; Thomas Tschernig; Andreas Schmiedl; Birgitt Gutbier; Bernd Schmeck; Stefan Hippenstiel; Harm Peters; Lars Morawietz; Norbert Suttorp; Martin Witzenrath Journal: Crit Care Date: 2010-07-30 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Alexander Hoetzel; Rene Schmidt; Simone Vallbracht; Ulrich Goebel; Tamas Dolinay; Hong Pyo Kim; Emeka Ifedigbo; Stefan W Ryter; Augustine M K Choi Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Jens Altrichter; Martin Sauer; Katharina Kaftan; Thomas Birken; Doris Gloger; Martin Gloger; Jörg Henschel; Heiko Hickstein; Ernst Klar; Sebastian Koball; Annette Pertschy; Gabriele Nöldge-Schomburg; Dierk A Vagts; Steffen R Mitzner Journal: Crit Care Date: 2011-03-03 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Matthijs Kox; Michiel Vaneker; Johannes G van der Hoeven; Gert-Jan Scheffer; Cornelia W Hoedemaekers; Peter Pickkers Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-04-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Thomas Rimmelé; Ata Murat Kaynar; Joseph N McLaughlin; Jeffery V Bishop; Morgan V Fedorchak; Anan Chuasuwan; Zhiyong Peng; Kai Singbartl; Daniel R Frederick; Lin Zhu; Melinda Carter; William J Federspiel; Adriana Zeevi; John A Kellum Journal: Crit Care Date: 2013-03-26 Impact factor: 9.097