Literature DB >> 16248933

Face processing and familiarity: evidence from eye-movement data.

Paula C Stacey1, Stephanie Walker, Jean D M Underwood.   

Abstract

How is information extracted from familiar and unfamiliar faces? Three experiments, in which eye-movement measures were used, examined whether there was differential sampling of the internal face region according to familiarity. Experiment 1 used a face familiarity task and found that whilst the majority of fixations fell within the internal region, there were no differences in the sampling of this region according to familiarity. Experiment 2 replicated these findings, using a standard recognition memory paradigm. The third experiment employed a matching task, and once again found that the majority of fixations fell within the internal region. Additionally, this experiment found that there was more sampling of the internal region when faces were familiar compared with when they were unfamiliar. The use of eye fixation measures affirms the importance of internal facial features in the recognition of familiar faces compared with unfamiliar faces, but only when viewers compare pairs of faces.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16248933     DOI: 10.1348/000712605X47422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  23 in total

1.  The revealing glance: eye gaze behavior to concealed information.

Authors:  Charlotte Schwedes; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

2.  The face inversion effect is not a consequence of aberrant eye movements.

Authors:  Carrick C Williams; John M Henderson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

3.  The effect of varying talker identity and listening conditions on gaze behavior during audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Julie N Buchan; Martin Paré; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  A novel perceptual trait: gaze predilection for faces during visual exploration.

Authors:  Nitzan Guy; Hagar Azulay; Rasha Kardosh; Yarden Weiss; Ran R Hassin; Salomon Israel; Yoni Pertzov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Infrequent faces bias social attention differently in manual and oculomotor measures.

Authors:  Effie J Pereira; Elina Birmingham; Jelena Ristic
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Scanning strategies do not modulate face identification: eye-tracking and near-infrared spectroscopy study.

Authors:  Yosuke Kita; Atsuko Gunji; Kotoe Sakihara; Masumi Inagaki; Makiko Kaga; Eiji Nakagawa; Toru Hosokawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Scan patterns during the processing of facial identity in prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Jason J S Barton; Nathan Radcliffe; Mariya V Cherkasova; Jay A Edelman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Drawing cartoon faces--a functional imaging study of the cognitive neuroscience of drawing.

Authors:  R Chris Miall; Emma Gowen; John Tchalenko
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Fixation patterns during recognition of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces.

Authors:  Goedele van Belle; Meike Ramon; Philippe Lefèvre; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-06-17

10.  Category Processing and the human likeness dimension of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis: Eye-Tracking Data.

Authors:  Marcus Cheetham; Ivana Pavlovic; Nicola Jordan; Pascal Suter; Lutz Jancke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.