Literature DB >> 16248717

Giving up and giving in: the costs and benefits of daily sacrifice in intimate relationships.

Emily A Impett1, Shelly L Gable, Letitia Anne Peplau.   

Abstract

This research provided the first empirical investigation of how approach and avoidance motives for sacrifice in intimate relationships are associated with personal well-being and relationship quality. In Study 1, the nature of everyday sacrifices made by dating partners was examined, and a measure of approach and avoidance motives for sacrifice was developed. In Study 2, which was a 2-week daily experience study of college students in dating relationships, specific predictions from the theoretical model were tested and both longitudinal and dyadic components were included. Whereas approach motives for sacrifice were positively associated with personal well-being and relationship quality, avoidance motives for sacrifice were negatively associated with personal well-being and relationship quality. Sacrificing for avoidance motives was particularly detrimental to the maintenance of relationships over time. Perceptions of a partner's motives for sacrifice were also associated with well-being and relationship quality. Implications for the conceptualization of relationship maintenance processes along these 2 dimensions are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16248717     DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  22 in total

1. 

Authors:  Tinneke Van Camp; Martine Hébert; Mylène Fernet; Martin Blais; Francine Lavoie
Journal:  J Int Vict       Date:  2013-12-19

2.  A new look at social support: a theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships.

Authors:  Brooke C Feeney; Nancy L Collins
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-08-14

3.  A tale of two systems: Testing a positive and negative valence systems framework to understand social disconnection across anxiety and depressive disorders.

Authors:  Charles T Taylor; Sarah L Pearlstein; Murray B Stein
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.839

4.  Suspicion of Motives Predicts Minorities' Responses to Positive Feedback in Interracial Interactions.

Authors:  Brenda Major; Jonathan W Kunstman; Brenna D Malta; Pamela J Sawyer; Sarah S M Townsend; Wendy Berry Mendes
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2016-01-01

5.  A mathematical model of sentimental dynamics accounting for marital dissolution.

Authors:  José-Manuel Rey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A meta-analytic review of religious or spiritual involvement and social health among cancer patients.

Authors:  Allen C Sherman; Thomas V Merluzzi; James E Pustejovsky; Crystal L Park; Login George; George Fitchett; Heather S L Jim; Alexis R Munoz; Suzanne C Danhauer; Mallory A Snyder; John M Salsman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Rejection sensitivity moderates the impact of rejection on self-concept clarity.

Authors:  Ozlem Ayduk; Anett Gyurak; Anna Luerssen
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-08-27

8.  After All I Have Done For You: Self-silencing Accommodations Fuel Women's Post-Rejection Hostility.

Authors:  Rainer Romero-Canyas; Kavita S Reddy; Sylvia Rodriguez; Geraldine Downey
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2013-07-01

9.  The differential association between change request qualities and resistance, problem resolution, and relationship satisfaction.

Authors:  Danielle M Mitnick; Richard E Heyman; Jill Malik; Amy M Smith Slep
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2009-08

10.  Linguistic indicators of wives' attachment security and communal orientation during military deployment.

Authors:  Jessica L Borelli; David A Sbarra; Ashley K Randall; Jonathan E Snavely; Heather K St John; Sarah K Ruiz
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  2013-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.