Literature DB >> 16247691

Rate of chromosome changes and speciation in reptiles.

Ettore Olmo1.   

Abstract

The chromosome changing rate (i.e. the number of chromosome rearrangements per million years) was studied in 1,329 reptile species in order to evaluate the karyological evolutionary trend and the existence of possible correlations between chromosome mutations and some aspects of the evolution of this class. The results obtained highlight the existence of a general direct correlation between chromosome changing rate and number of living species, although different trends can be observed in the different orders and suborders. In turtles, the separation of pleurodires from cryptodires was accompanied by a considerable karyological diversification. Among pleurodires, the evolution of the Chelidae and Pelomedusidae was also characterised by chromosome variation, while in cryptodires a marked karyological homogeneity is observed between and within infra-orders. Similarly there is no correlation between changing rate and species number in crocodiles, where the evolution of the families and genera has entailed few chromosome mutations. Chromosome variability was greater in lizards and snakes. In the formers variations in chromosome changing rate accompanied the separation of the infra-orders and the evolution of most of the families and of some genera. The origin of snakes has also been accompanied by a marked karyological diversification, while the subsequent evolution of the infra-orders and families has entailed a high level of chromosome variability only in colubroids. The karyological evolution in reptiles generally entailed a progressive reduction in chromosome changing rate, albeit with differences in the diverse orders and suborders. This trend seems to be consistent with the "canalization model" as originally proposed by Bickham and Baker in [Bickham, J.W. & R J. Baker, 1979. Bull. Carnegie Mus. Nat. Hist. 13: 70-84.] However, several inconsistencies have been found excluding that in this class the ultimate goal of chromosome variations was the achievement of a so-called "optimum karyotype'' as suggested by the above-mentioned theory. Other mechanisms could underpin chromosome variability in Reptiles. Among them a genomic composition more or less favourable to promoting chromosome rearrangements and factors favouring the fixation of a mutant karyotype in condition of homozygosis. Turtles and crocodiles would have a genome characterised by large chromosomes and a low level of chromosome compartmentalisation limiting the recombination and the frequency of rearrangements. A low rate of chromosome variability modifying little if at all the gene linkage groups would have favoured a conservative evolutionary strategy. In the course of evolution, lizards and snakes could have achieved a genome characterised by smaller chromosomes and a higher level of compartmentalisation. This would have raised the frequency of recombination and consequently an evolutionary strategy promoting a higher degree of variability and a greater level of speciation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16247691     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-005-8008-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  21 in total

Review 1.  The birds and the bees and the flowers and the trees: lessons from genetic mapping of sex determination in plants and animals.

Authors:  Deborah Charlesworth; Judith E Mank
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Reconstruction of the vertebrate ancestral genome reveals dynamic genome reorganization in early vertebrates.

Authors:  Yoichiro Nakatani; Hiroyuki Takeda; Yuji Kohara; Shinichi Morishita
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Compositional properties and thermal adaptation of 18S rRNA in vertebrates.

Authors:  Annalisa Varriale; Giuseppe Torelli; Giorgio Bernardi
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 4.942

4.  Phylogenomics of the genus Mus (Rodentia; Muridae): extensive genome repatterning is not restricted to the house mouse.

Authors:  Frederic Veyrunes; Gauthier Dobigny; Fengtang Yang; Patricia C M O'Brien; Josette Catalan; Terence J Robinson; Janice Britton-Davidian
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Evolution of sex chromosomes in Sauropsida.

Authors:  Christopher L Organ; Daniel E Janes
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 3.326

6.  Three tiers of genome evolution in reptiles.

Authors:  Chris L Organ; Ricardo Godínez Moreno; Scott V Edwards
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 3.326

7.  Evolutionary rates of mitochondrial genomes correspond to diversification rates and to contemporary species richness in birds and reptiles.

Authors:  Soo Hyung Eo; J Andrew DeWoody
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Anolis sex chromosomes are derived from a single ancestral pair.

Authors:  Tony Gamble; Anthony J Geneva; Richard E Glor; David Zarkower
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Physical Mapping and Refinement of the Painted Turtle Genome (Chrysemys picta) Inform Amniote Genome Evolution and Challenge Turtle-Bird Chromosomal Conservation.

Authors:  Daleen Badenhorst; LaDeana W Hillier; Robert Literman; Eugenia Elisabet Montiel; Srihari Radhakrishnan; Yingjia Shen; Patrick Minx; Daniel E Janes; Wesley C Warren; Scott V Edwards; Nicole Valenzuela
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Chromosomal homology of Uraeotyphlus oxyurus group of species (Amphibia, Gymnophiona, Ichthyophiidae).

Authors:  G Venu; G Venkatachalaiah
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 1.800

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.