BACKGROUND: A multicenter investigational survey (Japanese Guideline for Arrhythmia Management By Individual Therapy) was conducted to evaluate the validity of using CD-ROM guidelines vs physician choice for the selection of antiarrhythmic drugs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF, n=274) or premature ventricular contractions (PVC, n=216) were enrolled. The rate of concordance for drug selection between the treating physician and the CD-ROM was 216 of 274 patients (78.8%) with PAF. Of these, 168 (61.3%) were concordant for first-line agents and the remaining 48 (17.5%) were concordant for second-line agents. The concordance for the treatment of PVC was 154/216 cases (71.3%). Of these, 106 (49.1%) were concordant for first-line agents and the remaining 48 (22.2%) were concordant for second-line agents. Nonconcordance for PAF therapy was more likely to occur for patients with underlying heart disease (p<0.05), depressed cardiac function (p<0.001), and with more frequent ECG abnormalities and renal dysfunction. These differences were not seen in patients with PVC. CONCLUSION: The CD-ROM guidelines appear to be valid in the selection of antiarrhythmic drugs for both PAF and PVC, but their usefulness is influenced by the patient's clinical characteristics.
BACKGROUND: A multicenter investigational survey (Japanese Guideline for Arrhythmia Management By Individual Therapy) was conducted to evaluate the validity of using CD-ROM guidelines vs physician choice for the selection of antiarrhythmic drugs. METHODS AND RESULTS:Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF, n=274) or premature ventricular contractions (PVC, n=216) were enrolled. The rate of concordance for drug selection between the treating physician and the CD-ROM was 216 of 274 patients (78.8%) with PAF. Of these, 168 (61.3%) were concordant for first-line agents and the remaining 48 (17.5%) were concordant for second-line agents. The concordance for the treatment of PVC was 154/216 cases (71.3%). Of these, 106 (49.1%) were concordant for first-line agents and the remaining 48 (22.2%) were concordant for second-line agents. Nonconcordance for PAF therapy was more likely to occur for patients with underlying heart disease (p<0.05), depressed cardiac function (p<0.001), and with more frequent ECG abnormalities and renal dysfunction. These differences were not seen in patients with PVC. CONCLUSION: The CD-ROM guidelines appear to be valid in the selection of antiarrhythmic drugs for both PAF and PVC, but their usefulness is influenced by the patient's clinical characteristics.