Literature DB >> 16246736

Syllable structure and sonority in language inventory and aphasic neologisms.

Prisca Stenneken1, Roelien Bastiaanse, Walter Huber, Arthur M Jacobs.   

Abstract

Phonological theories have raised the notion of a universally preferred syllable type which is defined in terms of its sonority structure (e.g., ). Empirical evidence for this notion has been provided by distributional analyses of natural languages and of language acquisition data, and by aphasic speech error analyses. The present study investigates frequency distributions of syllable types in German, which allows for a rather complex syllable structure, and in neologistic utterances of a German speaking jargon aphasic. The findings suggest that the sonority structure of the patient's neologisms is generally in accordance with the notion of theoretically preferred syllables. Moreover, comparative analyses suggest that the predominance of the preferred syllable type is especially pronounced in the aphasic data. On the basis of these findings, the influence of sonority in impaired phonological lexical processing is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16246736     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  6 in total

1.  Sensitivity to Phonological Universals: The Case of Stops and Fricatives.

Authors:  Katalin Tamási; Iris Berent
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-08

2.  Listeners' knowledge of phonological universals: Evidence from nasal clusters.

Authors:  Iris Berent; Tracy Lennertz; Paul Smolensky; Vered Vaknin
Journal:  Phonology       Date:  2009

3.  The interface between morphology and phonology: exploring a morpho-phonological deficit in spoken production.

Authors:  Ariel M Cohen-Goldberg; Joana Cholin; Michele Miozzo; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-03-06

4.  Quantifying the Beauty of Words: A Neurocognitive Poetics Perspective.

Authors:  Arthur M Jacobs
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Why 'piss' is ruder than 'pee'? The role of sound in affective meaning making.

Authors:  Arash Aryani; Markus Conrad; David Schmidtke; Arthur Jacobs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Reading Shakespeare Sonnets: Combining Quantitative Narrative Analysis and Predictive Modeling -an Eye Tracking Study.

Authors:  Shuwei Xue; Jana Lüdtke; Teresa Sylvester; Arthur M Jacobs
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 0.957

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.