Literature DB >> 16246656

Randomized trial of mifepristone and buccal or vaginal misoprostol for abortion through 56 days of last menstrual period.

Tamer Middleton1, Eric Schaff, Stephen L Fielding, Mary Scahill, Caitlin Shannon, Emily Westheimer, Tracey Wilkinson, Beverly Winikoff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Mifepristone-misoprostol medical abortion has been approved in the United States since 2000. U.S. providers have preferred to use vaginal misoprostol because of evidence that such a regimen is more effective in later gestations. Buccal administration of misoprostol may be equally effective and more acceptable to some women.
METHODS: This open-label, randomized trial was conducted at two sites in Rochester, NY, and involved healthy women with pregnancies through 56 days since the last menstrual period (LMP) as indicated by sonogram. Women received mifepristone 200 mg orally and were randomized to use 800 mug of misoprostol either buccally or vaginally 1 to 2 days later. They returned within 15 days for repeat sonogram. If the woman's pregnancy had not been completely aborted by day 36, a suction abortion was performed. The primary outcome was a complete abortion without surgical intervention.
RESULTS: Four hundred forty-two women were enrolled in the study, and complete data were available on 429. The efficacy rate was 95% (205/216) in the buccal group and 93% (199/213) in the vaginal group (chi(2)=0.43, p=.51). Nausea was the most commonly reported side effect, affecting 70% in the buccal group and 62% in the vaginal group. There were no differences in the satisfaction with the overall procedure between the buccal (92%) and the vaginal groups (95%) (chi(2)=1.87, p=.17).
CONCLUSION: Buccal administration of misoprostol after low-dose mifepristone for medical abortion appears to be a highly effective and acceptable alternative compared with vaginal administration for medical abortion in pregnancies through 56 days LMP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16246656     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  6 in total

1.  Buccal versus vaginal misoprostol administration for the induction of first and second trimester abortions.

Authors:  Geetika Garg; Navneet Takkar; Alka Sehgal
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-10-31

Review 2.  Medical methods for first trimester abortion.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Kunyan Zhou; Dan Shan; Xiaoyan Luo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-24

3.  Effectiveness of medical abortion with mifepristone and buccal misoprostol through 59 gestational days.

Authors:  Mary Fjerstad; Irving Sivin; E Steve Lichtenberg; James Trussell; Kelly Cleland; Vanessa Cullins
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-05-02       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Rates of serious infection after changes in regimens for medical abortion.

Authors:  Mary Fjerstad; James Trussell; Irving Sivin; E Steve Lichtenberg; Vanessa Cullins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Medical methods for first trimester abortion.

Authors:  Regina Kulier; Nathalie Kapp; A Metin Gülmezoglu; G Justus Hofmeyr; Linan Cheng; Aldo Campana
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-11-09

6.  Medical termination for pregnancy in early first trimester (≤ 63 days) using combination of mifepristone and misoprostol or misoprostol alone: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ferid A Abubeker; Antonella Lavelanet; Maria I Rodriguez; Caron Kim
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 2.809

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.