Literature DB >> 16246480

Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (Part 3): variation by dentist factors.

P S K Lucarotti1, R L Holder, F J T Burke.   

Abstract

AIM: It is the aim of this paper to investigate the survival of direct-placement restorations provided within the General Dental Services in England and Wales, in relation to the dentist factors which may affect this.
METHODS: For this work, survival of a restoration was considered to be the time between the date of completion of the course of treatment in which it was placed and the date of acceptance of the course of treatment when the next tooth-specific treatment was carried out on the same tooth. A modified version of Kaplan-Meier statistical methodology was used to plot survival curves for restorations placed by different subgroups of dentists.
RESULTS: The age and experience of the dentist who placed the original restoration were found to be related to restoration survival, with older dentists having shorter intervals from placement of restorations to re-intervention (P<0.001). Country of qualification seems not to be relevant within Europe in terms of restoration survival, but dentists who qualified outside Europe achieve different restoration survival times for the restorations that they place. Dentist's gender has no relationship with time from restoration to re-intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: Dentist factors such as age, country of qualification, and employment status, but not the gender of the dentist, have been found to influence the survival of directly placed restorations.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16246480     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  7 in total

1.  The ultimate guide to restoration longevity in England and Wales. Part 2: Amalgam restorations - time to next intervention and to extraction of the restored tooth.

Authors:  F J T Burke; P S K Lucarotti
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Longevity of posterior composite restorations in children suffering from early childhood caries-results from a retrospective study.

Authors:  Merve Bayram; Beyza Ballı Akgöl; Nilüfer Üstün
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  A 24-month evaluation of amalgam and resin-based composite restorations: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Michael S McCracken; Valeria V Gordan; Mark S Litaker; Ellen Funkhouser; Jeffrey L Fellows; Douglass G Shamp; Vibeke Qvist; Jeffrey S Meral; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.634

4.  Repair vs replacement of failed restorations in general dental practice: factors influencing treatment choices and outcomes.

Authors:  H Javidi; M Tickle; V R Aggarwal
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Dental Treatment in a State-Funded Primary Dental Care Facility: Contextual and Individual Predictors of Treatment Need?

Authors:  Kristina L Wanyonyi; David R Radford; Jennifer E Gallagher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Dentists' decisions regarding the need for cuspal coverage for endodontically treated and vital posterior teeth.

Authors:  Motasum Abu-Awwad
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2019-04-15

7.  Placement of Posterior Composite Restorations: A Cross-Sectional Study of Dental Practitioners in Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Mohamed M Awad; Mansour Alradan; Nawaf Alshalan; Ali Alqahtani; Feras Alhalabi; Mohammed Ali Salem; Ahmed Rabah; Ali Alrahlah
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.