Literature DB >> 16246217

Orlistat for the treatment of obesity: cost utility model.

D R Foxcroft1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the cost utility of orlistat treatment based on (i) criteria from recent guidance from the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) for England and Wales (treatment discontinued if weight loss < 5% at 3 months; and < 10% at 6 months); and (ii) alternative criteria from the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA) licence for orlistat prescription in the European Community (treatment discontinued if weight loss < 5% at 3 months). Subjects were 1398 obese individuals who participated in three large European Phase III trials of orlistat treatment for adults (BMI: 28-47 kg m(-2)). Measures were: response to treatment in orlistat and placebo treatment groups; health benefit expressed as quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained associated with weight loss; costs associated with orlistat treatment. In the cost utility model with multiway sensitivity analysis, the cost/QALY gained using the NICE criteria was estimated to be 24,431 pounds (sensitivity analysis range: 10,856 to 77,197 pounds). The cost/QALY gained using the alternative EMEA criteria was estimated to be 19,005 pounds (range: 8,840 to 57,798 pounds). In conclusion, NICE guidance for the continued use of orlistat was supported in this updated cost utility model, comparing favourably with a previously published estimate of 45,881 pounds per QALY gained. Moreover, the value for money of orlistat treatment is improved further if EMEA treatment criteria for continued orlistat treatment are applied. The EMEA criteria should be considered in any future changes to the NICE guidance or in guidance issued by similar agencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16246217     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2005.00211.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Rev        ISSN: 1467-7881            Impact factor:   9.213


  8 in total

Review 1.  Orlistat: a review of its use in the management of obesity.

Authors:  Sheridan Henness; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  An economic evaluation of adaptive e-learning devices to promote weight loss via dietary change for people with obesity.

Authors:  Alec Miners; Jody Harris; Lambert Felix; Elizabeth Murray; Susan Michie; Phil Edwards
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Health state preferences associated with weight status in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Mandy B Belfort; John A F Zupancic; Katherine M Riera; Jane H G Turner; Lisa A Prosser
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.125

4.  Clinical and economic considerations of antiobesity treatment: a review of orlistat.

Authors:  Armineh Zohrabian
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2010-07-05

5.  Evaluation of efficacy and safety of orlistat in obese patients.

Authors:  Suyog S Jain; Sunita J Ramanand; Jaiprakash B Ramanand; Pramod B Akat; Milind H Patwardhan; Sachin R Joshi
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-04

6.  Cost-effectiveness of pharmacotherapy to reduce obesity.

Authors:  J Lennert Veerman; Jan J Barendregt; Megan Forster; Theo Vos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A novel decision model to predict the impact of weight management interventions: The Core Obesity Model.

Authors:  Sandra Lopes; Henrik H Meincke; Mark Lamotte; Anamaria-Vera Olivieri; Michael E J Lean
Journal:  Obes Sci Pract       Date:  2021-03-09

Review 8.  Orlistat in the prevention of diabetes in the obese patient.

Authors:  Marcio C Mancini; Alfredo Halpern
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2008
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.