C Antro1, F Merico, R Urbino, V Gai. 1. Dipartimento di Emergenza e Accettazione, Ospedale San Giovanni Battista, Turin, Italy. c.antro@tiscalinet.it
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe our experience with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: A prospective/retrospective, observational study on 190 patients with ARF (mean +/-SD age 72.2+/-12.9 years, mean APACHE II score 18.9+/-5.9), who received 200 NIV trials in an ED. We analysed the NIV register data (prospectively collected) and medical records (retrospective data abstraction) and evaluated clinical indications for NIV, patient outcomes, and predictive factors for success and death. NIV success was defined as tolerance of the procedure and no need for endotracheal intubation (ETI). RESULTS: Main indications to NIV were cardiogenic pulmonary oedema (CPE) (70 trials), acute exacerbation of COPD (39), both CPE and acute exacerbation of COPD (11), pneumonia (48), decompensation of obesity/hypoventilation (6), other conditions (26). The procedure was successful in 60.5% of trials. Global mortality was 34.5%, similar to the APACHE II predicted mortality of 32%. ETI rates were 6.5% and tracheostomy rates 1%. The improvement of pH within six hours after NIV initiation was predictive of survival in the hypercapnic group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the global efficacy of NIV in an ED setting, and show that, in spite of lower success rate in "real practice" in comparison with RCTs, an intermediate care unit can represent an appropriate and less expensive setting to perform this technique. The low rate of ETI seems to be because of the high number of patients for whom NIV was used as "ceiling" treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To describe our experience with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: A prospective/retrospective, observational study on 190 patients with ARF (mean +/-SD age 72.2+/-12.9 years, mean APACHE II score 18.9+/-5.9), who received 200 NIV trials in an ED. We analysed the NIV register data (prospectively collected) and medical records (retrospective data abstraction) and evaluated clinical indications for NIV, patient outcomes, and predictive factors for success and death. NIV success was defined as tolerance of the procedure and no need for endotracheal intubation (ETI). RESULTS: Main indications to NIV were cardiogenic pulmonary oedema (CPE) (70 trials), acute exacerbation of COPD (39), both CPE and acute exacerbation of COPD (11), pneumonia (48), decompensation of obesity/hypoventilation (6), other conditions (26). The procedure was successful in 60.5% of trials. Global mortality was 34.5%, similar to the APACHE II predicted mortality of 32%. ETI rates were 6.5% and tracheostomy rates 1%. The improvement of pH within six hours after NIV initiation was predictive of survival in the hypercapnic group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the global efficacy of NIV in an ED setting, and show that, in spite of lower success rate in "real practice" in comparison with RCTs, an intermediate care unit can represent an appropriate and less expensive setting to perform this technique. The low rate of ETI seems to be because of the high number of patients for whom NIV was used as "ceiling" treatment.
Authors: L Brochard; J Mancebo; M Wysocki; F Lofaso; G Conti; A Rauss; G Simonneau; S Benito; A Gasparetto; F Lemaire Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1995-09-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M Confalonieri; A Potena; G Carbone; R D Porta; E A Tolley; G Umberto Meduri Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: T J Martin; J D Hovis; J P Costantino; M I Bierman; M P Donahoe; R M Rogers; J W Kreit; F C Sciurba; R A Stiller; M H Sanders Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: C Delclaux; E L'Her; C Alberti; J Mancebo; F Abroug; G Conti; C Guérin; F Schortgen; Y Lefort; M Antonelli; E Lepage; F Lemaire; L Brochard Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-11-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Neha N Goel; Clark Owyang; Shamsuddoha Ranginwala; George T Loo; Lynne D Richardson; Kusum S Mathews Journal: Respir Care Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 2.258
Authors: Killen H Briones-Claudett; Mónica H Briones-Claudett; Mariuxi Del Pilar Cabrera Baños; Killen H Briones Zamora; Diana C Briones Marquez; Luc J I Zimmermann; Antonio W D Gavilanes; Michelle Grunauer Journal: Crit Care Res Pract Date: 2022-08-03
Authors: Juan F Masa; Isabel Utrabo; Javier Gomez de Terreros; Myriam Aburto; Cristóbal Esteban; Enric Prats; Belén Núñez; Ángel Ortega-González; Luis Jara-Palomares; M Jesus Martin-Vicente; Eva Farrero; Alicia Binimelis; Ernest Sala; José C Serrano-Rebollo; Emilia Barrot; Raquel Sánchez-Oro-Gomez; Ramón Fernández-Álvarez; Francisco Rodríguez-Jerez; Javier Sayas; Pedro Benavides; Raquel Català; Francisco J Rivas; Carlos J Egea; Antonio Antón; Patricia Peñacoba; Ana Santiago-Recuerda; M A Gómez-Mendieta; Lidia Méndez; José J Cebrian; Juan A Piña; Enrique Zamora; Gonzalo Segrelles Journal: BMC Pulm Med Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 3.317