Literature DB >> 16243715

C-terminal Src kinase (CSK) and CSK-homologous kinase (CHK)--endogenous negative regulators of Src-family protein kinases.

Yuh-Ping Chong1, Terrence D Mulhern, Heung-Chin Cheng.   

Abstract

C-terminal Src kinase (CSK) and CSK-homologous kinase (CHK) are endogenous inhibitors of the Src-family protein tyrosine kinases (SFKs). Since constitutive activation of SFKs contributes to cancer formation and progression, to prevent excessive activation of SFKs, their activity in normal cells is kept at the basal level by CSK and CHK. CSK and CHK inactivate SFKs by specifically phosphorylating a consensus tyrosine (called Y(T)) near their C-termini. Upon phosphorylation, the phospho-Y(T) engages in intramolecular interactions that lock the SFK molecule in an inactive conformation. SFKs are anchored to the plasma membrane, while CSK and CHK are localized predominantly in the cytosol. To inhibit SFKs, CSK and CHK need to translocate to the plasma membrane. Recruitment of CSK and CHK to the plasma membrane is mediated by the binding of their SH2, SH3 and/or kinase domains to specific transmembrane proteins, G-proteins and adaptor proteins located near the plasma membrane. For CSK, membrane recruitment often accompanies activation. CSK and CHK employ two types of direct interactions with SFKs to achieve efficient Y(T) phosphorylation: (i) short-range interactions involving binding of the active sites of CSK and CHK to specific residues near Y(T), (ii) long-range non-catalytic interactions involving binding of SFKs to motifs located distally from the active sites of CSK and CHK. The interactions between CSK and SFKs are transient in nature. Unlike CSK, CHK binds tightly to SFKs to form stable protein complexes. The binding is non-catalytic as it is independent of Y(T). More importantly, the tight binding alone is sufficient to completely inhibit SFKs. This non-catalytic inhibitory binding represents a novel mechanism employed by CHK to inhibit SFKs. Given that SFKs are implicated in cancer development, compounds mimicking the non-catalytic inhibitory mechanism of CHK are potential anti-cancer therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16243715     DOI: 10.1080/08977190500178877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Growth Factors        ISSN: 0897-7194            Impact factor:   2.511


  37 in total

1.  G-CSF receptor activation of the Src kinase Lyn is mediated by Gab2 recruitment of the Shp2 phosphatase.

Authors:  Muneyoshi Futami; Quan-Sheng Zhu; Zakary L Whichard; Ling Xia; Yuehai Ke; Benjamin G Neel; Gen-Sheng Feng; Seth J Corey
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Purification, crystallization, small-angle X-ray scattering and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of the SH2 domain of the Csk-homologous kinase.

Authors:  Natalie J Gunn; Michael A Gorman; Renwick C J Dobson; Michael W Parker; Terrence D Mulhern
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun       Date:  2011-02-23

3.  Involvement of ER-α36, Src, EGFR and STAT5 in the biphasic estrogen signaling of ER-negative breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Xin-Tian Zhang; Ling Ding; Lian-Guo Kang; Zhao-Yi Wang
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Tyrosine phosphorylated Par3 regulates epithelial tight junction assembly promoted by EGFR signaling.

Authors:  Yiguo Wang; Dan Du; Longhou Fang; Guang Yang; Chenyi Zhang; Rong Zeng; Axel Ullrich; Friedrich Lottspeich; Zhengjun Chen
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 5.  Src signaling pathways in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Varkaris; Anastasia D Katsiampoura; John C Araujo; Gary E Gallick; Paul G Corn
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 9.264

6.  The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator controls biliary epithelial inflammation and permeability by regulating Src tyrosine kinase activity.

Authors:  Romina Fiorotto; Ambra Villani; Antonis Kourtidis; Roberto Scirpo; Mariangela Amenduni; Peter J Geibel; Massimiliano Cadamuro; Carlo Spirli; Panos Z Anastasiadis; Mario Strazzabosco
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 17.425

7.  Suppression of hepatic glucose production by human neutrophil alpha-defensins through a signaling pathway distinct from insulin.

Authors:  Hui-Yu Liu; Qu Fan Collins; Fatiha Moukdar; Degen Zhuo; Jianmin Han; Tao Hong; Sheila Collins; Wenhong Cao
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Characterizing tyrosine phosphorylation signaling in lung cancer using SH2 profiling.

Authors:  Kazuya Machida; Steven Eschrich; Jiannong Li; Yun Bai; John Koomen; Bruce J Mayer; Eric B Haura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The Y's that bind: negative regulators of Src family kinase activity in platelets.

Authors:  D K Newman
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.824

10.  Control of excitatory synaptic transmission by C-terminal Src kinase.

Authors:  Jindong Xu; Manjula Weerapura; Mohammad K Ali; Michael F Jackson; Hongbin Li; Gang Lei; Sheng Xue; Chun L Kwan; Morris F Manolson; Kai Yang; John F Macdonald; Xian-Min Yu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.