| Literature DB >> 16243336 |
Nicola Joseph Nasser1, Adi Friedman, Michael Friedman, Eitan Moor, Rami Mosheiff.
Abstract
This study compares non-absorbable, ethyl cellulose (EC) membranes and absorbable, chitosan (CH) membranes in a rabbit model. Bone regeneration, evaluated by radiological and pathological parameters, was seen in both groups. In the EC group the process was faster but was followed by a sharp decrease, whereas in the CH group it was slower and continuous.Entities:
Mesh：
Substances：
Year: 2005 PMID： 16243336 DOI： 10.1016/j.injury.2005.05.015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Injury ISSN： 0020-1383 Impact factor: 2.586