Literature DB >> 16243174

Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism: long-term results.

Glenda H de Villa1, Chiung-Shing Huang, Philip K T Chen, Yu-Ray Chen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify the long-term maxillomandibular changes after surgical correction of mandibular prognathism using bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients who underwent BSSO to setback the mandible and had cephalometric radiographs taken preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 weeks, 1 year, and long-term follow-up (mean, 28 months). The cephalograms were traced and measured to determine the operative and postoperative changes. Correlation analyses were performed to see the relationship between the magnitude of setback and the amount of long-term postsurgical change at B point and pogonion.
RESULTS: The mean surgical setback was 8.2 mm at B point and 8.8 mm at pogonion. The mean long-term horizontal relapse was 2.3 mm (28.0%) at B point and 3.0 mm (34.1%) at pogonion. Out of 20 patients, 12 (60.0%) relapsed horizontally greater than 2 mm at B point and 13 (65.0%) at pogonion. The mean vertical surgical changes showed downward displacement of B point (2.3 mm) and pogonion (2.0 mm). The mean long-term vertical relapse was 1.6 mm (69.6%) at B point and 1.7 mm (85.0%) at pogonion.
CONCLUSION: There was no correlation between the magnitude of setback and the amount of relapse at B point and pogonion. However, there was significant correlation between the magnitude of vertical, downward surgical displacement and the amount of vertical relapse at B point and pogonion. The majority of the maxillofacial changes occurred within 1 year postoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16243174     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.03.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  5 in total

1.  Skeletal Relapse After Mandibular Setback in Bi Max Surgery: Intraoral Vertical Ramus versus Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomies.

Authors:  Ra'ed M A Al-Delayme; Moutaz Al-Khen
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-08-06

2.  Long-term follow-up of intersegmental displacement after orthognathic surgery using cone-beam computed tomographic superimposition.

Authors:  Jae-Yeol Lee; Seung-Min Lee; Sung-Hun Kim; Yong-Il Kim
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Skeletal Class III and open bite treated with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and molar intrusion using titanium screws.

Authors:  Rena Togawa; Shoichiro Iino; Shouichi Miyawaki
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Long-term stability of surgical-orthodontic correction of class III malocclusions with long-face syndrome.

Authors:  David Gallego-Romero; José-María Llamas-Carrera; Daniel Torres-Lagares; Vanessa Paredes; Eduardo Espinar; Eduardo Guevara; José-Luis Gutiérrez-Pérez
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-05-01

5.  Comparative study of postoperative stability between conventional orthognathic surgery and a surgery-first orthognathic approach after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for skeletal class III correction.

Authors:  Deuk-Hyun Mah; Su-Gwan Kim; Ji-Su Oh; Jae-Seek You; Seo-Yun Jung; Won-Gi Kim; Kyung-Hwan Yu
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-02-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.