Literature DB >> 16243006

Tree disagreement: measuring and testing incongruence in phylogenies.

Paul J Planet1.   

Abstract

The branching patterns of phylogenetic trees often disagree even when they have been constructed using different portions of the same data. This phylogenetic discord (incongruence) can be explained by real differences in evolutionary process or history, but also may be due simply to random chance or sampling error. Techniques for measuring and testing the significance of phylogenetic incongruence are used widely in systematic biology, and are necessary when considering genome-scale datasets composed of multiple genes that may or may not have different histories. They are also applicable wherever tree algorithms are used for ordering and interpreting data (e.g., DNA microarrays). Here, I review the different incongruence tests and use them to test the phylogenetic discord of a potentially mobile genetic element (the widespread colonization Island) in the gamma-proteobacteria. I then consider how incongruence tests may be used as a starting point for phylogenetic analysis that accounts for horizontal transfer and duplication events as explanations for homoplasy.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16243006     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  30 in total

Review 1.  Applying evolutionary genetics to developmental toxicology and risk assessment.

Authors:  Maxwell C K Leung; Andrew C Procter; Jared V Goldstone; Jonathan Foox; Robert DeSalle; Carolyn J Mattingly; Mark E Siddall; Alicia R Timme-Laragy
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 3.143

2.  New arrangement of three genera of fish tapeworms (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae) in catfishes (Siluriformes) from the Neotropical Region: taxonomic implications of molecular phylogenetic analyses.

Authors:  Philippe V Alves; Alain de Chambrier; José L Luque; Ricardo M Takemoto; Luiz E R Tavares; Tomáš Scholz
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Reassortment and concerted evolution in banana bunchy top virus genomes.

Authors:  Jer-Ming Hu; Hui-Chuan Fu; Chia-Hua Lin; Hong-Ji Su; Hsin-Hung Yeh
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Complete genome sequence of Aggregatibacter (Haemophilus) aphrophilus NJ8700.

Authors:  Maria Pia Di Bonaventura; Rob DeSalle; Mihai Pop; Niranjan Nagarajan; David H Figurski; Daniel H Fine; Jeffrey B Kaplan; Paul J Planet
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  The evolution of the major hepatitis C genotypes correlates with clinical response to interferon therapy.

Authors:  Phillip S Pang; Paul J Planet; Jeffrey S Glenn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Dental Data Perform Relatively Poorly in Reconstructing Mammal Phylogenies: Morphological Partitions Evaluated with Molecular Benchmarks.

Authors:  Robert S Sansom; Matthew Albion Wills; Tamara Williams
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 9.160

7.  The performance of the Congruence Among Distance Matrices (CADM) test in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  Véronique Campbell; Pierre Legendre; François-Joseph Lapointe
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Accuracy of phylogeny reconstruction methods combining overlapping gene data sets.

Authors:  Anne Kupczok; Heiko A Schmidt; Arndt von Haeseler
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 1.405

9.  GiRaF: robust, computational identification of influenza reassortments via graph mining.

Authors:  Niranjan Nagarajan; Carl Kingsford
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Prokaryotic evolution and the tree of life are two different things.

Authors:  Eric Bapteste; Maureen A O'Malley; Robert G Beiko; Marc Ereshefsky; J Peter Gogarten; Laura Franklin-Hall; François-Joseph Lapointe; John Dupré; Tal Dagan; Yan Boucher; William Martin
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 4.540

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.