BACKGROUND: Pericardial substitutes are known to ensure safer resternotomy at reoperation. A synthetic sheet made from expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) has been most commonly used as a pericardial substitute. The e-PTFE sheet, however, can induce severe inflammatory reaction and diffuse fibrosis. This study was designed to investigate the absorption rate and tissue reaction associated with two absorbable pericardial substitutes: a gelatin sheet and L-lactic acid-epsilon-caprolactone copolymer (L-C copolymer). In addition, e-PTFE sheet and autologous pericardium were used as controls. METHODS: Sixty dogs were divided into four groups of 15. In group A, a 3 x 3 cm segment of pericardium was excised, and the autologous pericardium was resutured. In group B, the pericardial defect was replaced with gelatin sheet. In group C, the defect was replaced with L-C copolymer sheet. In group D, the defect was replaced with e-PTFE sheet. For each group, the implanted membranes were retrieved at 2 weeks (n = 1), 4 weeks (n = 3), 12 weeks (n = 5), and 24 weeks (n = 6) after implantation. RESULTS: The e-PTFE sheet produced severe adhesions to the heart and pleura and a more prominent inflammatory reaction, as compared with the gelatin sheet. The absorbable pericardial substitutes were completely absorbed by 24 weeks after implantation, and were replaced with fibrous membrane. CONCLUSIONS: Gelatin sheet may involve less adhesion and a reduced inflammatory reaction compared with e-PTFE.
BACKGROUND: Pericardial substitutes are known to ensure safer resternotomy at reoperation. A synthetic sheet made from expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) has been most commonly used as a pericardial substitute. The e-PTFE sheet, however, can induce severe inflammatory reaction and diffuse fibrosis. This study was designed to investigate the absorption rate and tissue reaction associated with two absorbable pericardial substitutes: a gelatin sheet and L-lactic acid-epsilon-caprolactone copolymer (L-C copolymer). In addition, e-PTFE sheet and autologous pericardium were used as controls. METHODS: Sixty dogs were divided into four groups of 15. In group A, a 3 x 3 cm segment of pericardium was excised, and the autologous pericardium was resutured. In group B, the pericardial defect was replaced with gelatin sheet. In group C, the defect was replaced with L-C copolymer sheet. In group D, the defect was replaced with e-PTFE sheet. For each group, the implanted membranes were retrieved at 2 weeks (n = 1), 4 weeks (n = 3), 12 weeks (n = 5), and 24 weeks (n = 6) after implantation. RESULTS: The e-PTFE sheet produced severe adhesions to the heart and pleura and a more prominent inflammatory reaction, as compared with the gelatin sheet. The absorbable pericardial substitutes were completely absorbed by 24 weeks after implantation, and were replaced with fibrous membrane. CONCLUSIONS: Gelatin sheet may involve less adhesion and a reduced inflammatory reaction compared with e-PTFE.