Literature DB >> 16242293

A literature review of the psychological impact of genetic testing on breast cancer patients.

Kathryn J Schlich-Bakker1, Herman F J ten Kroode, Margreet G E M Ausems.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Easier access and increased awareness results in more referral for genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer in healthy at-risk women and breast cancer patients. To investigate the psychological impact of genetic testing on breast cancer patients, literature pertaining to this group was reviewed.
METHOD: Medline and PsychInfo databases were searched over the period 1995-2004 for studies aimed at breast cancer patients referred for genetic testing. Qualitative and quantitative psychological outcome measures were identified.
RESULTS: Eight papers were identified focusing on women affected by breast cancer and undergoing genetic counseling and DNA testing.
CONCLUSION: Genetic testing does not lead to an increase in psychological distress in breast cancer patients. However, a recent breast cancer diagnosis adds to general and cancer-specific distress prior to genetic counseling and after DNA test disclosure. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians need to be aware of possible high psychological distress and additional counseling needs of recently diagnosed breast cancer patients taking part in genetic testing. Further research should focus on patients who decline genetic counseling or receive an inconclusive test result, including age upon and time since diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16242293     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  27 in total

Review 1.  Specific psychosocial issues of individuals undergoing genetic counseling for cancer - a literature review.

Authors:  Willem Eijzenga; Daniela E E Hahn; Neil K Aaronson; Irma Kluijt; Eveline M A Bleiker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  A family history questionnaire improves detection of women at risk for hereditary gynecologic cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Margot M Koeneman; Arnold-Jan Kruse; Simone J S Sep; Cynthia S Gubbels; Brigitte F M Slangen; Toon van Gorp; Alberto Lopes; Encarna Gomez-Garcia; Roy F P M Kruitwagen
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 3.  Psychological aspects, risk and protective factors related to BRCA genetic testing: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Lucia Lombardi; Sonia M Bramanti; Alessandra Babore; Liborio Stuppia; Carmen Trumello; Ivana Antonucci; Alessandra Cavallo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  BRCA1/2 genetic testing uptake and psychosocial outcomes in men.

Authors:  Kristi D Graves; Rhoda Gatammah; Beth N Peshkin; Ayelet Krieger; Christy Gell; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  You never call, you never write: why return of 'omic' results to research participants is both a good idea and a moral imperative.

Authors:  Misha Angrist
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Implementation and outcomes of telephone disclosure of clinical BRCA1/2 test results.

Authors:  Linda Patrick-Miller; Brian L Egleston; Mary Daly; Evelyn Stevens; Dominique Fetzer; Andrea Forman; Lisa Bealin; Christina Rybak; Candace Peterson; Melanie Corbman; Angela R Bradbury
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-08-19

7.  BRCA1/2 mutation testing in breast cancer patients: a prospective study of the long-term psychological impact of approach during adjuvant radiotherapy.

Authors:  Kathryn J Schlich-Bakker; Margreet G E M Ausems; Maria Schipper; Herman F J Ten Kroode; Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; Jan van den Bout
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Subjective versus objective risk in genetic counseling for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancers.

Authors:  Anita Caruso; Cristina Vigna; Bruna Marozzo; Fabio M Sega; Isabella Sperduti; Francesco Cognetti; Antonella Savarese
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-21

9.  The relationship between psychological distress and personality in women from families with familial breast/ovarian or hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer in the absence of demonstrated mutations.

Authors:  Amy Østertun Geirdal; Alv A Dahl
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Probability estimation models for prediction of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: COS compares favourably with other models.

Authors:  Hassan Roudgari; Zosia H Miedzybrodzka; Neva E Haites
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.