Literature DB >> 16241177

The effect of nasopharyngoscopic biofeedback in patients with cleft palate and velopharyngeal dysfunction.

Monika Brunner1, Angelika Stellzig-Eisenhauer, Ute Pröschel, Rolf Verres, Gerda Komposch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the immediate, long-term, and carry-over effects of nasopharyngoscopic biofeedback therapy in patients with cleft palate who exhibit velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD).
DESIGN: Pre- versus posttreatment and follow-up comparisons.
SETTING: Cleft palate center of the Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
SUBJECTS: Eleven patients with VPD who had received conventional speech therapy without showing significant improvement.
INTERVENTIONS: A four-stage feedback procedure. The patients watched and evaluated their velopharyngeal (VP) valving during speech by an endoscopic image displayed on a video monitor. Two feedback sessions took place for every target sound. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean occurrence of VP closure during speech sound production on different linguistic levels. Patients' self-perception was assessed by a questionnaire and speech diary.
RESULTS: Significant improvement and stability of VP closure was noted. Mean occurrence of VP closure was 5% before therapy, 91% after two biofeedback sessions, and 86% in the follow-up after 6 months. Velopharyngeal dysfunction associated with compensatory articulation proved to be equally well trained as VPD on sounds with good articulatory placement. No significant difference was observed in the degree of improvement between phoneme-specific VPD and generalized VPD. The transfer to the level of words and sentences was successful and showed significant stability. The stability of VP closure for vowels was less than the stability for fricatives and stop sounds. Patients gained improved auditory and kinesthetic self-perception of their articulation.
CONCLUSIONS: Nasopharyngoscopic biofeedback therapy proves to be a quick and effective method to change VPD. It shows stable results and carry-over effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16241177     DOI: 10.1597/03-044.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  5 in total

1.  Effects of Biofeedback on Control and Generalization of Nasalization in Typical Speakers.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Heller Murray; Joseph O Mendoza; Simone V Gill; Joseph S Perkell; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Video Game Rehabilitation of Velopharyngeal Dysfunction: A Case Series.

Authors:  Gabriel J Cler; Talia Mittelman; Maia N Braden; Geralyn Harvey Woodnorth; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  [Different patterns of velopharyngeal dysfunction in cleft palate patients].

Authors:  M Brunner; S Dockter; F Feldhusen; U Pröschel; P Plinkert; G Komposch; E Müssig
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Correlation of Vocal Intensity with Velopharyngeal Closing Mechanism in Individuals with and without Complaint of Velopharyngeal Dysfunction.

Authors:  Karina Girelli; Sady Selaimen de Costa; Marcus Vinícius Martins Collares; Silvia Dornelles
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-11-24

5.  Nasoendoscopy of velopharynx before and during diagnostic therapy.

Authors:  Maria Inês Pegoraro-Krook; Jeniffer de Cassia Rillo Dutka-Souza; Viviane Cristina de Castro Marino
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.