Literature DB >> 1624085

Does H2 receptor antagonist-resistant ulcer exist?--A review based on bioavailability in man.

K Kawai1.   

Abstract

Recently the term H2 receptor antagonist-resistant (H2RA-resistant) ulcer has been used increasingly commonly, instead of the conventional term of intractable ulcer, to designate an ulcer which does not respond to treatment with an H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA). However, many authors report that an H2RA resistant ulcer can be cured by increasing the dosage of H2RA, or using another H2RA. In this study, the absorption and bioavailability of oral doses of each of three H2RAs, which are possible factors in these effects, were studied in healthy volunteers. The results showed that there was a great difference in bioavailability between cimetidine (80%), famotidine (39%) and ranitidine (50%). The lower bioavailability of famotidine and ranitidine may be partially explained by the following facts: 35.8% to 57.8% of orally administered famotidine is decomposed in gastric acid (pH 1) before absorption; and about 50% of ranitidine is metabolized in the liver before distribution (first-pass effect). Thus famotidine and ranitidine should be carefully administered to patients with slow gastric emptying and hepatic dysfunction, respectively. In general practice, many patients may not respond well to treatments because of their poor absorption, or extensive metabolism. In such cases, further effectiveness and safety could be expected if another H2RA, appropriately tailored to patients' conditions, were chosen. On the basis of these findings, it would seem premature to conclude that H2RA-resistant ulcer exists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1624085     DOI: 10.1007/bf02777764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Jpn        ISSN: 0435-1339


  15 in total

1.  Inter- and intrasubject variations of ranitidine pharmacokinetics after oral administration to normal male subjects.

Authors:  C K Shim; J S Hong
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.534

2.  The efficacy of cimetidine in the treatment of "resistant" duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  M D Young; W O Frank; R G Karlstadt; S O'Connell; R H Palmer; F W Rockhold; D G Kogut; T A Loiudice; J L Orchard; R C Stone
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.393

3.  Resistant duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  T A LoIudice; D Kogut
Journal:  Ohio Med       Date:  1987-03

4.  Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of cimetidine.

Authors:  A Grahnén; C von Bahr; B Lindström; A Rosén
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Bioavailability of cimetidine in man.

Authors:  S S Walkenstein; J W Dubb; W C Randolph; W J Westlake; R M Stote; A P Intoccia
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Cimetidine transport in rat renal brush border and basolateral membrane vesicles.

Authors:  M Takano; K Inui; T Okano; R Hori
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1985-10-28       Impact factor: 5.037

7.  Effects of renal failure on blood levels of cimetidine.

Authors:  K W Ma; D C Brown; D S Masler; S E Silvis
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 8.  Cimetidine: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  R N Brogden; R C Heel; T M Speight; G S Avery
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Pharmacokinetics of famotidine in man.

Authors:  H Kroemer; U Klotz
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol       Date:  1987-08

Review 10.  Comparative pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of cimetidine and ranitidine.

Authors:  D A Richards
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.