Literature DB >> 16240379

The methodology of the Utah Birth Defect Network: congenital heart defects as an illustration.

Marcia Feldkamp1, Lynne Macleod, Luciana Young, Kara Lecheminant, John C Carey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Utah Birth Defect Network (UBDN) uses a population-based birth defect surveillance system that has evolved from identifying only neural tube defects in 1994 to monitoring all structural malformations since 1999. All pregnancy outcomes are monitored statewide through intensive identification of potential cases using multiple reporting sources.
METHODS: The UBDN is a well-established statewide surveillance system that uses a combined approach, active and passive, in case ascertainment. Utah has the distinct advantage of having relatively few points of entry into the health care system both pre- and postnatally. A description of the UBDN methodology is presented and the completeness, validity and timing of reporting sources and diagnoses are illustrated using the example of congenital heart defects (CHD).
RESULTS: The UBDN identified a total of 2,115 potential CHD cases, of which 1,082 (51.2%) were determined to be true cases and 1,033 (48.8%) were classified as not a case (NAC). A single source was responsible for reporting 1,038 (49.1%) potential cases:241 (23.2%) were true cases, and the remaining 797 (76.8%) were classified as NAC and considered to be false positives. DISCUSSION: This descriptive analysis of CHD cases collected through the UBDN's surveillance system illustrates the necessity--and benefit--of using multiple sources of ascertainment to ensure completeness of reporting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16240379     DOI: 10.1002/bdra.20212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol        ISSN: 1542-0752


  6 in total

1.  A quality assessment of reporting sources for microcephaly in Utah, 2003 to 2013.

Authors:  Amy Steele; Jane Johnson; Amy Nance; Robert Satterfield; C J Alverson; Cara Mai
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2016-11

2.  Parental needs among children with birth defects: defining a parent-to-parent support network.

Authors:  A M Mathiesen; C J Frost; K M Dent; M L Feldkamp
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Costs, mortality, and hospital usage in relation to prenatal diagnosis in d-transposition of the great arteries.

Authors:  Nelangi M Pinto; Richard Nelson; Lorenzo Botto; Michael D Puchalski; Sergey Krikov; Jaewhan Kim; Norman J Waitzman
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Prevalence of esophageal atresia among 18 international birth defects surveillance programs.

Authors:  Natasha Nassar; Emanuele Leoncini; Emmanuelle Amar; Jazmín Arteaga-Vázquez; Marian K Bakker; Carol Bower; Mark A Canfield; Eduardo E Castilla; Guido Cocchi; Adolfo Correa; Melinda Csáky-Szunyogh; Marcia L Feldkamp; Babak Khoshnood; Danielle Landau; Nathalie Lelong; Jorge S López-Camelo; R Brian Lowry; Robert McDonnell; Paul Merlob; Julia Métneki; Margery Morgan; Osvaldo M Mutchinick; Miland N Palmer; Anke Rissmann; Csaba Siffel; Antonin Sìpek; Elena Szabova; David Tucker; Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2012-09-03

5.  Assessing the Practices of Population-Based Birth Defects Surveillance Programs Using the CDC Strategic Framework, 2012.

Authors:  Cara T Mai; Adolfo Correa; Russell S Kirby; Deborah Rosenberg; Michael Petros; Michael C Fagen
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Etiology and clinical presentation of birth defects: population based study.

Authors:  Marcia L Feldkamp; John C Carey; Janice L B Byrne; Sergey Krikov; Lorenzo D Botto
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-05-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.